The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
RAMOBoost: Ranked Minority Oversampling in Boosting
Open accessAbstract
In recent years, learning from imbalanced data has attracted growing attention from both academia and industry due to the explosive growth of applications that use and produce imbalanced data. However, because of the complex characteristics of imbalanced data, many real-world solutions struggle to provide robust efficiency in learning-based applications. In an effort to address this problem, this paper presents Ranked Minority Oversampling in Boosting (RAMOBoost), which is a RAMO technique based on the idea of adaptive synthetic data generation in an ensemble learning system. Briefly, RAMOBoost adaptively ranks minority class instances at each learning iteration according to a sampling probability distribution that is based on the underlying data distribution, and can adaptively shift the decision boundary toward difficult-to-learn minority and majority class instances by using a hypothesis assessment procedure. Simulation analysis on 19 real-world datasets assessed over various metrics-including overall accuracy, precision, recall, F-measure, G-mean, and receiver operation characteristic analysis-is used to illustrate the effectiveness of this method.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
SMOTE synthetic minority over-sampling technique
Chawla, N. V., Bowyer, K. W., Hall, L. O., & Kegelmeyer, W. P. (2002) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · doi:10.1613/jair.953 · Cited by 32,865
A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting
Freund, Y., & Schapire, R. E. (1997) · Journal of Computer and System Sciences · doi:10.1006/jcss.1997.1504 · Cited by 20,466
Popular Ensemble Methods: An Empirical Study
Opitz, D., & Maclin, R. (1999) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · doi:10.1613/jair.614 · Cited by 2,953
Mining with rarity: a unifying framework
Weiss, G. M. (2004) · ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter · doi:10.1145/1007730.1007734 · Cited by 1,393
Robust classification for imprecise environments
Provost, F., & Fawcett, T. (2001) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1007601015854 · Cited by 1,250
KBA: kernel boundary alignment considering imbalanced data distribution
Wu, G., & Chang, E. Y. (2005) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2005.95 · Cited by 380
Cited by
Learning from class-imbalanced data: Review of methods and applications
Haixiang, G., Yijing, L., Shang, J., Mingyun, G., Yuanyue, H., & Bing, G. (2017) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2016.12.035 · Cited by 2,377
MWMOTE--Majority Weighted Minority Oversampling Technique for Imbalanced Data Set Learning
Barua, S., Islam, M. M., Yao, X., & Murase, K. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2012.232 · Cited by 1,150
A Survey of Predictive Modeling on Imbalanced Domains
Branco, P., Torgo, L., & Ribeiro, R. P. (2017) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/2907070 · Cited by 1,129
Elreedy, D., & Atiya, A. F. (2019) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2019.07.070 · Cited by 756
Multiclass Imbalance Problems: Analysis and Potential Solutions
Wang, S., & Yao, X. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics) · doi:10.1109/tsmcb.2012.2187280 · Cited by 567
Metadata
- Authors
- Chen, S., He, H., & Garcia, E. A.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks
- Published
- 2010-10
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1624-1642
- ISSN
- 1045-9227 (ISSN-L)
- 1941-0093
- OpenAlex
- W2096235960
- Cited by
- 208
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 11.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: RAMOBoost: Ranked Minority Oversampling in Boosting. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tnn.2010.2066988
- The paper
- Chen, S., He, H., & Garcia, E. A. (2010). RAMOBoost: Ranked Minority Oversampling in Boosting. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks. https://doi.org/10.1109/tnn.2010.2066988
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.