Cited by 188Adaptive Control of Nonlinear SystemsFuzzy Logic and Control SystemsDynamics and Control of Mechanical Systems

Fuzzy-Neural-Network Inherited Sliding-Mode Control for Robot Manipulator Including Actuator Dynamics

Rong-Jong Wai, Muthusamy, Rajkumar·2013·IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems

Abstract

This paper presents the design and analysis of an intelligent control system that inherits the robust properties of sliding-mode control (SMC) for an n-link robot manipulator, including actuator dynamics in order to achieve a high-precision position tracking with a firm robustness. First, the coupled higher order dynamic model of an n-link robot manipulator is briefy introduced. Then, a conventional SMC scheme is developed for the joint position tracking of robot manipulators. Moreover, a fuzzy-neural-network inherited SMC (FNNISMC) scheme is proposed to relax the requirement of detailed system information and deal with chattering control efforts in the SMC system. In the FNNISMC strategy, the FNN framework is designed to mimic the SMC law, and adaptive tuning algorithms for network parameters are derived in the sense of projection algorithm and Lyapunov stability theorem to ensure the network convergence as well as stable control performance. Numerical simulations and experimental results of a two-link robot manipulator actuated by DC servo motors are provided to justify the claims of the proposed FNNISMC system, and the superiority of the proposed FNNISMC scheme is also evaluated by quantitative comparison with previous intelligent control schemes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tnnls.2012.2228230

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Intelligent control techniques such as fuzzy logic systems and neural networks are proposed to approximate unknown or uncertain system dynamics, but they focus on robustness rather than optimal tracking performance, and input and state constraints are usually not of interest.

    “To alleviate the need of concrete mathematical modeling and parameter identification, intelligent control techniques, such as fuzzy logic systems [10] and neural networks (NNs) [11], are proposed to approximate unknown/uncertain system dynamics. Yet, these approaches also pay more attention to robustness, not to optimal tracking performance. In addition, input and state constraints are usually not”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wai, R.-J., & Muthusamy, R.
Affiliations
Yuan Ze University (TW)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems
Published
2013-02
Volume
24
Issue
2
Pages
274-287
ISSN
  • 2162-237X (ISSN-L)
  • 2162-2388
OpenAlex
W2050918738
Cited by
188
References
39
Citations by year
2025: 7 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 6
FWCI
16.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Adaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Fuzzy Logic and Control Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Dynamics and Control of Mechanical Systems
Keywords
sliding mode control, robot manipulators, actuator dynamics, joint position tracking, chattering reduction, projection algorithm, Lyapunov stability, DC servo motor, two-link manipulator
MeSH terms
Robotics, Neural Networks, Computer, Fuzzy Logic, Nonlinear Dynamics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review