Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 256

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Global and Local Structure Preservation for Feature Selection

Open access
Liu, Xinwang, Wang, Lei, Zhang, Jian, Yin, Jianping, Liu, Huan·2014·IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems

Abstract

The recent literature indicates that preserving global pairwise sample similarity is of great importance for feature selection and that many existing selection criteria essentially work in this way. In this paper, we argue that besides global pairwise sample similarity, the local geometric structure of data is also critical and that these two factors play different roles in different learning scenarios. In order to show this, we propose a global and local structure preservation framework for feature selection (GLSPFS) which integrates both global pairwise sample similarity and local geometric data structure to conduct feature selection. To demonstrate the generality of our framework, we employ methods that are well known in the literature to model the local geometric data structure and develop three specific GLSPFS-based feature selection algorithms. Also, we develop an efficient optimization algorithm with proven global convergence to solve the resulting feature selection problem. A comprehensive experimental study is then conducted in order to compare our feature selection algorithms with many state-of-the-art ones in supervised, unsupervised, and semisupervised learning scenarios. The result indicates that: 1) our framework consistently achieves statistically significant improvement in selection performance when compared with the currently used algorithms; 2) in supervised and semisupervised learning scenarios, preserving global pairwise similarity is more important than preserving local geometric data structure; 3) in the unsupervised scenario, preserving local geometric data structure becomes clearly more important; and 4) the best feature selection performance is always obtained when the two factors are appropriately integrated. In summary, this paper not only validates the advantages of the proposed GLSPFS framework but also gains more insight into the information to be preserved in different feature selection tasks.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tnnls.2013.2287275

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 46 references

Cited by

See all 256

Metadata

Authors
Liu, X., Wang, L., Zhang, J., Yin, J., & Liu, H.
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems
Published
2014-06
Volume
25
Issue
6
Pages
1083-1095
ISSN
  • 2162-237X (ISSN-L)
  • 2162-2388
OpenAlex
W2168901348
Cited by
256
References
46
FWCI
13.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Global and Local Structure Preservation for Feature Selection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tnnls.2013.2287275
The paper
Liu, X., Wang, L., Zhang, J., Yin, J., & Liu, H. (2014). Global and Local Structure Preservation for Feature Selection. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems. https://doi.org/10.1109/tnnls.2013.2287275

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.