Cited by 176Adaptive Dynamic Programming ControlAdaptive Control of Nonlinear SystemsIterative Learning Control Systems

Learning-Based Adaptive Optimal Tracking Control of Strict-Feedback Nonlinear Systems

Gao, Weinan, Jiang, Zhong-Ping·2018·IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems

Abstract

This paper proposes a novel data-driven control approach to address the problem of adaptive optimal tracking for a class of nonlinear systems taking the strict-feedback form. Adaptive dynamic programming (ADP) and nonlinear output regulation theories are integrated for the first time to compute an adaptive near-optimal tracker without any a priori knowledge of the system dynamics. Fundamentally different from adaptive optimal stabilization problems, the solution to a Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman (HJB) equation, not necessarily a positive definite function, cannot be approximated through the existing iterative methods. This paper proposes a novel policy iteration technique for solving positive semidefinite HJB equations with rigorous convergence analysis. A two-phase data-driven learning method is developed and implemented online by ADP. The efficacy of the proposed adaptive optimal tracking control methodology is demonstrated via a Van der Pol oscillator with time-varying exogenous signals.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tnnls.2017.2761718

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • ADP is an effective way to achieve high performance of the optimal controller and relies on adaptive control, optimal control and reinforcement learning.

    “Adaptive dynamic programming (ADP) ensures an e ective way to achieve high performance of the optimal controller which relies on adaptive control, optimal control and reinforcement learning [9, 23-26].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gao, W., & Jiang, Z.-P.
Affiliations
  • Georgia Southern University (US)
  • New York University (US)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems
Published
2018-06
Volume
29
Issue
6
Pages
2614-2624
ISSN
  • 2162-237X (ISSN-L)
  • 2162-2388
OpenAlex
W2767307332
Cited by
176
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 1
FWCI
12.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
U.S. National Science Foundation (ECCS-1501044)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Adaptive Dynamic Programming Control
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Adaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Iterative Learning Control Systems
Keywords
strict-feedback nonlinear systems, adaptive dynamic programming, nonlinear output regulation, Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman equation, policy iteration, data-driven control, Van der Pol oscillator, online learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review