The DOI matches its Crossref record; 86 of the 86 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Systematic Study of Online Class Imbalance Learning With Concept Drift
Open accessAbstract
As an emerging research topic, online class imbalance learning often combines the challenges of both class imbalance and concept drift. It deals with data streams having very skewed class distributions, where concept drift may occur. It has recently received increased research attention; however, very little work addresses the combined problem where both class imbalance and concept drift coexist. As the first systematic study of handling concept drift in class-imbalanced data streams, this paper first provides a comprehensive review of current research progress in this field, including current research focuses and open challenges. Then, an in-depth experimental study is performed, with the goal of understanding how to best overcome concept drift in online learning with class imbalance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
SMOTE synthetic minority over-sampling technique
Chawla, N. V., Bowyer, K. W., Hall, L. O., & Kegelmeyer, W. P. (2002) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · doi:10.1613/jair.953 · Cited by 32,865
An introduction to ROC analysis
Fawcett, T. (2006) · Pattern Recognition Letters · doi:10.1016/j.patrec.2005.10.010 · Cited by 21,879
He, H., & Garcia, E. A. (2009) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2008.239 · Cited by 10,359
A systematic analysis of performance measures for classification tasks
Sokolova, M., & Lapalme, G. (2009) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2009.03.002 · Cited by 7,515
PAGE, E. S. (1954) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/41.1-2.100 · Cited by 5,739
ADASYN: Adaptive synthetic sampling approach for imbalanced learning
He, H., Bai, Y., Garcia, E. A., & Li, S. (2008) · 2008 IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence) · doi:10.1109/ijcnn.2008.4633969 · Cited by 4,521
Borderline-SMOTE : A New Over-Sampling Method in Imbalanced Data Sets Learning
Han, H., Wang, W.-Y., & Mao, B.-H. (2005) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/11538059_91 · Cited by 4,331
A study of the behavior of several methods for balancing machine learning training data
Batista, G. E. A. P. A., Prati, R. C., & Monard, M. C. (2004) · ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter · doi:10.1145/1007730.1007735 · Cited by 4,203
A survey on concept drift adaptation
Gama, J., Žliobaitė, I., Bifet, A., Pechenizkiy, M., & Bouchachia, A. (2014) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/2523813 · Cited by 3,735
The class imbalance problem: A systematic study1
Japkowicz, N., & Stephen, S. (2002) · Intelligent Data Analysis · doi:10.3233/ida-2002-6504 · Cited by 3,295
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, S., Minku, L. L., & Yao, X.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems
- Published
- 2018-10
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 4802-4821
- ISSN
- 2162-237X (ISSN-L)
- 2162-2388
- OpenAlex
- W2604756720
- Cited by
- 331
- References
- 86
- FWCI
- 18.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Systematic Study of Online Class Imbalance Learning With Concept Drift. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tnnls.2017.2771290
- The paper
- Wang, S., Minku, L. L., & Yao, X. (2018). A Systematic Study of Online Class Imbalance Learning With Concept Drift. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems. https://doi.org/10.1109/tnnls.2017.2771290
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
