The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cost-Effective Object Detection: Active Sample Mining With Switchable Selection Criteria
Open accessAbstract
Though quite challenging, leveraging large-scale unlabeled or partially labeled data in learning systems (e.g., model/classifier training) has attracted increasing attentions due to its fundamental importance. To address this problem, many active learning (AL) methods have been proposed that employ up-to-date detectors to retrieve representative minority samples according to predefined confidence or uncertainty thresholds. However, these AL methods cause the detectors to ignore the remaining majority samples (i.e., those with low uncertainty or high prediction confidence). In this paper, by developing a principled active sample mining (ASM) framework, we demonstrate that cost-effective mining samples from these unlabeled majority data are a key to train more powerful object detectors while minimizing user effort. Specifically, our ASM framework involves a switchable sample selection mechanism for determining whether an unlabeled sample should be manually annotated via AL or automatically pseudolabeled via a novel self-learning process. The proposed process can be compatible with mini-batch-based training (i.e., using a batch of unlabeled or partially labeled data as a one-time input) for object detection. In this process, the detector, such as a deep neural network, is first applied to the unlabeled samples (i.e., object proposals) to estimate their labels and output the corresponding prediction confidences. Then, our ASM framework is used to select a number of samples and assign pseudolabels to them. These labels are specific to each learning batch based on the confidence levels and additional constraints introduced by the AL process and will be discarded afterward. Then, these temporarily labeled samples are employed for network fine-tuning. In addition, a few samples with low-confidence predictions are selected and annotated via AL. Notably, our method is suitable for object categories that are not seen in the unlabeled data during the learning process. Extensive experiments on two public benchmarks (i.e., the PASCAL VOC 2007/2012 data sets) clearly demonstrate that our ASM framework can achieve performance comparable to that of the alternative methods but with significantly fewer annotations.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Outliers and noisy instances can affect the final performance.
“Finally, there are outliers and noisy instances that can affect the final performance.”
From Ten Years of Active Learning Techniques and Object Detection: A Systematic Review (2023) · cites this paper as [56]
It is challenging to identify images with real potential to improve performance.
“It is challenging to identify images with real potential to improve performance;”
From Ten Years of Active Learning Techniques and Object Detection: A Systematic Review (2023) · cites this paper as [56]
Dataset annotation for object detection requires a bounding box and the respective category for each object in the image, making annotation a labour-intensive task compared with classification or action recognition.
“Dataset annotation for OD requires a bounding box and the respective category for each object in the image, making the annotation a labour-intensive task compared with classification or action recognition;”
From Ten Years of Active Learning Techniques and Object Detection: A Systematic Review (2023) · cites this paper as [56]
Another way to select unlabelled images is according to the detector's confidence.
“Another way to select unlabelled images is according to the detector's confidence [56,64].”
From Ten Years of Active Learning Techniques and Object Detection: A Systematic Review (2023) · cites this paper as [56]
Citations
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474
ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2017) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3065386 · Cited by 112,155
Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networks
Ren, S., He, K., Girshick, R., & Sun, J. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2016.2577031 · Cited by 73,472
Bengio, Y., Louradour, J., Collobert, R., & Weston, J. (2009) · Proceedings of the 26th Annual International Conference on Machine Learning · doi:10.1145/1553374.1553380 · Cited by 5,366 · cited 2×
“Inspired by the principles of human/animal cognition, CL [15] was the first machine learning paradigm to adopt the concept of gradually adding samples to the training data in a controlled and meaningful (e.”
BackgroundMethodActive and semi-supervised learning for object detection with imperfect data
Rhee, P. K., Erdenee, E., Kyun, S. D., Ahmed, M. U., & Jin, S. (2017) · Cognitive Systems Research · doi:10.1016/j.cogsys.2017.05.006 · Cited by 55
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 39
- wang, 2018, Towards human-machine cooperation: Self-supervised sample mining for object detection, Proc IEEE Conf Comput Vis Pattern Recognit (CVPR)
- mcclosky, 2006, Reranking and self-training for parser adaptation, Proc Int Conf Comput Linguistics Assoc Comput Linguistics 44th Annu Meeting Assoc Comput Linguistics, 337
- dong, 2017, Few-example object detection with model communication
- jiang, 2014, Self-paced learning with diversity, Proc Adv Neural Inf Process Syst (NIPS), 2078
- 10.1145/2647868.2654918 · DOI
- kumar, 2010, Self-paced learning for latent variable models, Proc Adv Neural Inf Process Syst (NIPS), 1189
- chen, 2011, Co-training for domain adaptation, Proc Adv Neural Inf Process Syst (NIPS), 2456
- 10.1109/TCSVT.2012.2226528 · DOI
- 10.1109/TSMCB.2012.2214210 · DOI
- zhang, 2016, Bridging saliency detection to weakly supervised object detection based on self-paced curriculum learning, Proc Int Joint Conf Artif Intell (IJCAI), 3538
- dai, 2016, R-FCN: Object detection via region-based fully convolutional networks, Proc Adv Neural Inf Process Syst (NIPS), 379
- liang, 2016, Learning to detect concepts from webly-labeled video data, Proc Int Joint Conf Artif Intell (IJCAI), 1746
- 10.1007/978-1-4471-2099-5_1 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1145/2578726.2578765 · DOI
- 10.1109/CVPR.2011.5995430 · DOI
- 10.1109/CVPR.2011.5995523 · DOI
- jiang, 2015, Self-paced curriculum learning, Proc AAAI Conf Artif Intell (AAAI), 6
- 10.1109/TCSVT.2016.2589879 · DOI
- 10.1109/TPAMI.2017.2652459 · DOI
- 10.1109/CVPR.2013.308 · DOI
- 10.1109/CVPR.2014.81 · DOI · Paper page
- yan, 2017, Weakly-and semi-supervised object detection with expectation-maximization algorithm
- 10.1109/CVPR.2016.89 · DOI · Paper page
- tang, 2012, Shifting weights: Adapting object detectors from image to video, Proc Adv Neural Inf Process Syst (NIPS), 638
- liu, 2016, SSD: Single shot multibox detector, Proc Eur Conf Comput Vis (ECCV), 21
- 10.1109/TPAMI.2015.2389824 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/CVPR.2017.324 · DOI · Paper page
- szegedy, 2014, Going deeper with convolutions, Proc IEEE Conf Comput Vis Pattern Recognit (CVPR), 1
- 10.1109/ICCV.2015.169 · DOI · Paper page
- tong, 2002, Support vector machine active learning with applications to text classification, J Mach Learn Res, 2, 45
- 10.1109/TCYB.2016.2572306 · DOI
- he, 2009, Active subspace learning, Proc IEEE Int Conf Comput Vis (ICCV), 911
- lin, 2014, Microsoft COCO: Common objects in context, Proc Eur Conf Comput Vis (ECCV), 740
- agrawal, 2014, Analyzing the performance of multilayer neural networks for object recognition, Proc Eur Conf Comput Vis (ECCV), 329
- 10.1007/s11263-009-0275-4 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/TNNLS.2016.2608834 · DOI
- 10.1109/CVPR.2015.7298906 · DOI
- simonyan, 2015, Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition, Proc Int Conf Learn Represent
- hoffman, 2014, LSDA: Large scale detection through adaptation, Proc Adv Neural Inf Process Syst (NIPS), 3536
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ten Years of Active Learning Techniques and Object Detection: A Systematic Review
Garcia, D., Carias, J., Adão, T., Jesus, R., Cunha, A., & Magalhães, L. G. (2023) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app131910667 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, K., Lin, L., Yan, X., Chen, Z., Zhang, D., & Zhang, L.
- Affiliations
- Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK)
- Sun Yat-sen University (CN)
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems
- Published
- 2019-03
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 834-850
- ISSN
- 2162-237X (ISSN-L)
- 2162-2388
- OpenAlex
- W2963296333
- Cited by
- 38
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3
- FWCI
- 2.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Ten Thousand Talents Program
- Guangdong “Climbing Program” Special Funds (pdjhb0010)
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (U1611461, 61702565)
- Ministry of Public Security Science and Technology Police Foundation (2016GABJC48)
- Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province (2017B010116001)
- Hong Kong RGC General Research Fund (PolyU 152135/16E)
- Hong Kong Polytechnic University (G-SB20)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Algorithms
- Keywords
- active learning (machine learning), object detection, pseudo-labeling, self-learning, unlabeled data, partially labeled data, annotation cost reduction, mini-batch training, object proposals
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review