Cited by 38Advanced Neural Network ApplicationsDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningMachine Learning and Algorithms

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cost-Effective Object Detection: Active Sample Mining With Switchable Selection Criteria

Open access
Wang, Keze, Lin, Liang, Yan, Xiaopeng, Chen, Ziliang, Zhang, Dongyu, Zhang, Lei·2019·IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems

Abstract

Though quite challenging, leveraging large-scale unlabeled or partially labeled data in learning systems (e.g., model/classifier training) has attracted increasing attentions due to its fundamental importance. To address this problem, many active learning (AL) methods have been proposed that employ up-to-date detectors to retrieve representative minority samples according to predefined confidence or uncertainty thresholds. However, these AL methods cause the detectors to ignore the remaining majority samples (i.e., those with low uncertainty or high prediction confidence). In this paper, by developing a principled active sample mining (ASM) framework, we demonstrate that cost-effective mining samples from these unlabeled majority data are a key to train more powerful object detectors while minimizing user effort. Specifically, our ASM framework involves a switchable sample selection mechanism for determining whether an unlabeled sample should be manually annotated via AL or automatically pseudolabeled via a novel self-learning process. The proposed process can be compatible with mini-batch-based training (i.e., using a batch of unlabeled or partially labeled data as a one-time input) for object detection. In this process, the detector, such as a deep neural network, is first applied to the unlabeled samples (i.e., object proposals) to estimate their labels and output the corresponding prediction confidences. Then, our ASM framework is used to select a number of samples and assign pseudolabels to them. These labels are specific to each learning batch based on the confidence levels and additional constraints introduced by the AL process and will be discarded afterward. Then, these temporarily labeled samples are employed for network fine-tuning. In addition, a few samples with low-confidence predictions are selected and annotated via AL. Notably, our method is suitable for object categories that are not seen in the unlabeled data during the learning process. Extensive experiments on two public benchmarks (i.e., the PASCAL VOC 2007/2012 data sets) clearly demonstrate that our ASM framework can achieve performance comparable to that of the alternative methods but with significantly fewer annotations.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tnnls.2018.2852783

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 39

  1. wang, 2018, Towards human-machine cooperation: Self-supervised sample mining for object detection, Proc IEEE Conf Comput Vis Pattern Recognit (CVPR)
  2. mcclosky, 2006, Reranking and self-training for parser adaptation, Proc Int Conf Comput Linguistics Assoc Comput Linguistics 44th Annu Meeting Assoc Comput Linguistics, 337
  3. dong, 2017, Few-example object detection with model communication
  4. jiang, 2014, Self-paced learning with diversity, Proc Adv Neural Inf Process Syst (NIPS), 2078
  5. 10.1145/2647868.2654918 · DOI
  6. kumar, 2010, Self-paced learning for latent variable models, Proc Adv Neural Inf Process Syst (NIPS), 1189
  7. chen, 2011, Co-training for domain adaptation, Proc Adv Neural Inf Process Syst (NIPS), 2456
  8. 10.1109/TCSVT.2012.2226528 · DOI
  9. 10.1109/TSMCB.2012.2214210 · DOI
  10. zhang, 2016, Bridging saliency detection to weakly supervised object detection based on self-paced curriculum learning, Proc Int Joint Conf Artif Intell (IJCAI), 3538
  11. dai, 2016, R-FCN: Object detection via region-based fully convolutional networks, Proc Adv Neural Inf Process Syst (NIPS), 379
  12. liang, 2016, Learning to detect concepts from webly-labeled video data, Proc Int Joint Conf Artif Intell (IJCAI), 1746
  13. 10.1007/978-1-4471-2099-5_1 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1145/2578726.2578765 · DOI
  15. 10.1109/CVPR.2011.5995430 · DOI
  16. 10.1109/CVPR.2011.5995523 · DOI
  17. jiang, 2015, Self-paced curriculum learning, Proc AAAI Conf Artif Intell (AAAI), 6
  18. 10.1109/TCSVT.2016.2589879 · DOI
  19. 10.1109/TPAMI.2017.2652459 · DOI
  20. 10.1109/CVPR.2013.308 · DOI
  21. 10.1109/CVPR.2014.81 · DOI · Paper page
  22. yan, 2017, Weakly-and semi-supervised object detection with expectation-maximization algorithm
  23. 10.1109/CVPR.2016.89 · DOI · Paper page
  24. tang, 2012, Shifting weights: Adapting object detectors from image to video, Proc Adv Neural Inf Process Syst (NIPS), 638
  25. liu, 2016, SSD: Single shot multibox detector, Proc Eur Conf Comput Vis (ECCV), 21
  26. 10.1109/TPAMI.2015.2389824 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1109/CVPR.2017.324 · DOI · Paper page
  28. szegedy, 2014, Going deeper with convolutions, Proc IEEE Conf Comput Vis Pattern Recognit (CVPR), 1
  29. 10.1109/ICCV.2015.169 · DOI · Paper page
  30. tong, 2002, Support vector machine active learning with applications to text classification, J Mach Learn Res, 2, 45
  31. 10.1109/TCYB.2016.2572306 · DOI
  32. he, 2009, Active subspace learning, Proc IEEE Int Conf Comput Vis (ICCV), 911
  33. lin, 2014, Microsoft COCO: Common objects in context, Proc Eur Conf Comput Vis (ECCV), 740
  34. agrawal, 2014, Analyzing the performance of multilayer neural networks for object recognition, Proc Eur Conf Comput Vis (ECCV), 329
  35. 10.1007/s11263-009-0275-4 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1109/TNNLS.2016.2608834 · DOI
  37. 10.1109/CVPR.2015.7298906 · DOI
  38. simonyan, 2015, Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition, Proc Int Conf Learn Represent
  39. hoffman, 2014, LSDA: Large scale detection through adaptation, Proc Adv Neural Inf Process Syst (NIPS), 3536

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Wang, K., Lin, L., Yan, X., Chen, Z., Zhang, D., & Zhang, L.
Affiliations
  • Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK)
  • Sun Yat-sen University (CN)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems
Published
2019-03
Volume
30
Issue
3
Pages
834-850
ISSN
  • 2162-237X (ISSN-L)
  • 2162-2388
OpenAlex
W2963296333
Cited by
38
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3
FWCI
2.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Ten Thousand Talents Program
  • Guangdong “Climbing Program” Special Funds (pdjhb0010)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (U1611461, 61702565)
  • Ministry of Public Security Science and Technology Police Foundation (2016GABJC48)
  • Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province (2017B010116001)
  • Hong Kong RGC General Research Fund (PolyU 152135/16E)
  • Hong Kong Polytechnic University (G-SB20)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Algorithms
Keywords
active learning (machine learning), object detection, pseudo-labeling, self-learning, unlabeled data, partially labeled data, annotation cost reduction, mini-batch training, object proposals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review