Cited by 86Caching and Content DeliverySoftware-Defined Networks and 5GNetwork Traffic and Congestion Control

An SDN-Based CDN/ISP Collaboration Architecture for Managing High-Volume Flows

Wichtlhuber, Matthias, Reinecke, Robert, Hausheer, David·2015·IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management

Abstract

The collaboration of Internet service providers (ISPs) and content distribution network (CDN) providers was shown to be beneficial for both parties in a number of recent works. Influencing CDN edge server (surrogate) selection allows the ISP to manage the rising amount of traffic emanating from CDNs to reduce the operational expenditures (OPEX) of his infrastructure, e.g., by preventing peered traffic. At the same time, including the ISP's hidden network knowledge in the surrogate selection process influences the quality of service a CDN provider can deliver positively. As a large amount of CDN traffic is video-on-demand traffic, this paper investigates the topic of CDN/ISP collaboration from a perspective of high-volume long-living flows. These types of flows are hardly manageable with state-of-the-art Dynamic Name Service (DNS)-based redirection, as a reassignment of flows during the session is difficult to achieve. Consequently, varying load of surrogates caused by flash crowds and congestion events in the ISP's network are hard to compensate. This paper presents a novel approach promoting ISP and CDN collaboration based on a minimal deployment of software-defined networking switches in the ISP's network. The approach complements standard DNS-based redirection by allowing for a migration of high-volume flows between surrogates in the backend even if the communication has state information, such as Hyper Text Transfer Protocol sessions. In addition to a proof-of-concept, the evaluation identifies factors influencing performance and shows large performance increases when compared to standard DNS-based redirection.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tnsm.2015.2404792

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wichtlhuber, M., Reinecke, R., & Hausheer, D.
Affiliations
  • Technische Universität Darmstadt (DE)
  • Goethe University Frankfurt (DE)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management
Published
2015-03
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
48-60
ISSN
1932-4537 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2069672109
Cited by
86
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 3
FWCI
16.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management (publishedVersion)
  • TUbilio (Technical University of Darmstadt) (acceptedVersion)
  • TUbilio (Technical University of Darmstadt) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • European Union
  • German DFG
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Caching and Content Delivery
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Software-Defined Networks and 5G
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Traffic and Congestion Control
Keywords
software-defined networking, content delivery networks, surrogate selection, flow migration, flash crowds, network congestion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review