Cited by 21IoT and Edge/Fog ComputingSoftware System Performance and ReliabilityDistributed systems and fault tolerance

DRAGON: Decentralized Fault Tolerance in Edge Federations

Open access
Tuli, Shreshth, Casale, Giuliano, Jennings, Nicholas R.·2023·IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management

Abstract

Edge Federation is a new computing paradigm that seamlessly interconnects the resources of multiple edge service providers. A key challenge in such systems is the deployment of latency-critical and AI based resource-intensive applications in constrained devices. To address this challenge, we propose a novel memory-efficient deep learning based model, namely generative optimization networks (GON). Unlike GANs, GONs use a single network to both discriminate input and generate samples, significantly reducing their memory footprint. Leveraging the low memory footprint of GONs, we propose a decentralized fault-tolerance method called DRAGON that runs simulations (as per a digital modeling twin) to quickly predict and optimize the performance of the edge federation. Extensive experiments with real-world edge computing benchmarks on multiple Raspberry-Pi based federated edge configurations show that DRAGON can outperform the baseline methods in fault-detection and Quality of Service (QoS) metrics. Specifically, the proposed method gives higher F1 scores for fault-detection than the best deep learning (DL) method, while consuming lower memory than the heuristic methods. This allows for improvement in energy consumption, response time and service level agreement violations by up to 74, 63 and 82 percent, respectively.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tnsm.2022.3199886

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tuli, S., Casale, G., & Jennings, N. R.
Affiliations
  • Imperial College London (GB)
  • Loughborough University (GB)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management
Published
2023-03
Volume
20
Issue
1
Pages
276-291
ISSN
  • 1932-4537 (ISSN-L)
  • 2373-7379
OpenAlex
W4293198951
Cited by
21
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4
FWCI
1.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Funders
President’s Ph.D. scholarship at Imperial College London
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Software System Performance and Reliability
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Distributed systems and fault tolerance
Keywords
memory-efficient deep learning, digital twin, fault detection, quality of service, service level agreement violation, edge computing, Raspberry Pi, energy consumption, response time

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review