The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Robotic techniques for upper limb evaluation and rehabilitation of stroke patients
Abstract
This paper presents two robot devices for use in the rehabilitation of upper limb movements and reports the quantitative parameters obtained to characterize the rate of improvement, thus allowing a precise monitoring of patient's recovery. A one degree of freedom (DoF) wrist manipulator and a two-DoF elbow-shoulder manipulator were designed using an admittance control strategy; if the patient could not move the handle, the devices completed the motor task. Two groups of chronic post-stroke patients (G1 n = 7, and G2 n = 9) were enrolled in a three week rehabilitation program including standard physical therapy (45 min daily) plus treatment by means of robot devices, respectively, for wrist and elbow-shoulder movements (40 min, twice daily). Both groups were evaluated by means of standard clinical assessment scales and a new robot measured evaluation metrics that included an active movement index quantifying the patient's ability to execute the assigned motor task without robot assistance, the mean velocity, and a movement accuracy index measuring the distance of the executed path from the theoretic one. After treatment, both groups improved their motor deficit and disability. In G1, there was a significant change in the clinical scale values (p < 0.05) and range of motion wrist extension (p < 0.02). G2 showed a significant change in clinical scales (p < 0.01), in strength (p < 0.05) and in the robot measured parameters (p < 0.01). The relationship between robot measured parameters and the clinical assessment scales showed a moderate and significant correlation (r > 0.53 p < 0.03). Our findings suggest that robot-aided neurorehabilitation may improve the motor outcome and disability of chronic post-stroke patients. The new robot measured parameters may provide useful information about the course of treatment and its effectiveness at discharge.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Impedance Control: An Approach to Manipulation: Part I—Theory
Hogan, N. (1985) · Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control · doi:10.1115/1.3140702 · Cited by 3,673
Lum, P. S., Burgar, C. G., Shor, P. C., Majmundar, M., & Van der Loos, M. (2002) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1053/apmr.2001.33101 · Cited by 1,159 · cited 1×
“In particular, the MIT-Manus [13], [15], [17], [19], [20] and the mirror-image motion enabler (MIME) robots [16], [18], which were developed for unrestricted unilateral or bilateral shoulder and elbow movement, show that the recovery can be improved through additional therapy aided by robot technology.”
BackgroundRobot-Aided Neurorehabilitation: From Evidence-Based to Science-Based Rehabilitation
Krebs, H. I., Volpe, B. T., Ferraro, M., Fasoli, S., Palazzolo, J., Rohrer, B., Edelstein, L., & Hogan, N. (2002) · Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation · doi:10.1310/6177-qdjj-56du-0nw0 · Cited by 149
Cited by
Effects of Robot-Assisted Therapy on Upper Limb Recovery After Stroke: A Systematic Review
Kwakkel, G., Kollen, B. J., & Krebs, H. I. (2008) · Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair · doi:10.1177/1545968307305457 · Cited by 1,503
Review of control strategies for robotic movement training after neurologic injury
Marchal-Crespo, L., & Reinkensmeyer, D. J. (2009) · Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1186/1743-0003-6-20 · Cited by 1,182
Optimizing Compliant, Model-Based Robotic Assistance to Promote Neurorehabilitation
Wolbrecht, E. T., Chan, V., Reinkensmeyer, D. J., & Bobrow, J. E. (2008) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering · doi:10.1109/tnsre.2008.918389 · Cited by 506
Robotic-Assisted Rehabilitation of the Upper Limb After Acute Stroke
Masiero, S., Celia, A., Rosati, G., & Armani, M. (2007) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2006.10.032 · Cited by 409
Design strategies to improve patient motivation during robot-aided rehabilitation
Colombo, R., Pisano, F., Mazzone, A., Delconte, C., Micera, S., Carrozza, M. C., Dario, P., & Minuco, G. (2007) · Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1186/1743-0003-4-3 · Cited by 385
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Colombo, R., Pisano, F., Micera, S., Mazzone, A., Delconte, C., Carrozza, M. C., Dario, P., & Minuco, G.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
- Published
- 2005-09
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 311-324
- ISSN
- 1534-4320 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-0210
- OpenAlex
- W2110171919
- Cited by
- 399
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 12.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Robotic techniques for upper limb evaluation and rehabilitation of stroke patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tnsre.2005.848352
- The paper
- Colombo, R., Pisano, F., Micera, S., Mazzone, A., Delconte, C., Carrozza, M. C., Dario, P., & Minuco, G. (2005). Robotic techniques for upper limb evaluation and rehabilitation of stroke patients. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1109/tnsre.2005.848352
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.