The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Berlin brain-computer interface: EEG-based communication without subject training
Abstract
The Berlin Brain-Computer Interface (BBCI) project develops a noninvasive BCI system whose key features are 1) the use of well-established motor competences as control paradigms, 2) high-dimensional features from 128-channel electroencephalogram (EEG), and 3) advanced machine learning techniques. As reported earlier, our experiments demonstrate that very high information transfer rates can be achieved using the readiness potential (RP) when predicting the laterality of upcoming left- versus right-hand movements in healthy subjects. A more recent study showed that the RP similarily accompanies phantom movements in arm amputees, but the signal strength decreases with longer loss of the limb. In a complementary approach, oscillatory features are used to discriminate imagined movements (left hand versus right hand versus foot). In a recent feedback study with six healthy subjects with no or very little experience with BCI control, three subjects achieved an information transfer rate above 35 bits per minute (bpm), and further two subjects above 24 and 15 bpm, while one subject could not achieve any BCI control. These results are encouraging for an EEG-based BCI system in untrained subjects that is independent of peripheral nervous system activity and does not rely on evoked potentials even when compared to results with very well-trained subjects operating other BCI systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Brain–computer interfaces for communication and control
Wolpaw, J. R., Birbaumer, N., McFarland, D. J., Pfurtscheller, G., & Vaughan, T. M. (2002) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/s1388-2457(02)00057-3 · Cited by 7,927
Curran, E. (2003) · Brain and Cognition · doi:10.1016/s0278-2626(03)00036-8 · Cited by 417
Cited by
Optimizing Spatial filters for Robust EEG Single-Trial Analysis
Blankertz, B., Tomioka, R., Lemm, S., Kawanabe, M., & Muller, K.-R. (2008) · IEEE Signal Processing Magazine · doi:10.1109/msp.2008.4408441 · Cited by 2,080
Self-citationRenard, Y., Lotte, F., Gibert, G., Congedo, M., Maby, E., Delannoy, V., Bertrand, O., & Lécuyer, A. (2010) · Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments · doi:10.1162/pres.19.1.35 · Cited by 830
Convolutional Neural Networks for P300 Detection with Application to Brain-Computer Interfaces
Cecotti, H., & Graser, A. (2011) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2010.125 · Cited by 778
Denby, B., Schultz, T., Honda, K., Hueber, T., Gilbert, J. M., & Brumberg, J. S. (2010) · Speech Communication · doi:10.1016/j.specom.2009.08.002 · Cited by 487
Transfer Learning: A Riemannian Geometry framework with applications to Brain-Computer Interfaces
Zanini, P., Congedo, M., Jutten, C., Said, S., & Berthoumieu, Y. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.2017.2742541 · Cited by 412
Metadata
- Authors
- Blankertz, B., Dornhege, G., Krauledat, M., Muller, K.-R., Kunzmann, V., Losch, F., & Curio, G.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
- Published
- 2006-06
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 147-152
- ISSN
- 1534-4320 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-0210
- OpenAlex
- W2130705118
- Cited by
- 332
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 15.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Berlin brain-computer interface: EEG-based communication without subject training. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tnsre.2006.875557
- The paper
- Blankertz, B., Dornhege, G., Krauledat, M., Muller, K.-R., Kunzmann, V., Losch, F., & Curio, G. (2006). The Berlin brain-computer interface: EEG-based communication without subject training. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1109/tnsre.2006.875557
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.