Cited by 417EEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesGaze Tracking and Assistive TechnologyFree Will and Agency

Learning to control brain activity: A review of the production and control of EEG components for driving brain–computer interface (BCI) systems

Curran, E·2003·Brain and Cognition

Abstract

Brain-computer interface (BCI) technology relies on the ability of individuals to voluntarily and reliably produce changes in their electroencephalographic (EEG) activity. The present paper reviews research on cognitive tasks and other methods of generating and controlling specific changes in EEG activity that can be used to drive BCI systems. To date, motor imagery has been the most commonly used task. This paper explores the possibility that other cognitive tasks, including those used in imaging studies, may prove to be more effective. Other factors which influence performance are also considered in relation to selection of tasks, as well as training of subjects.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0278-2626(03)00036-8

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Users have reported reaching a state of proficiency through learning where BCI control becomes "automatic," as they no longer need to engage explicitly in MI.

    “Interestingly, users have reported reaching a state of proficiency through learning where BCI control becomes “automatic,” as they no longer need to engage explicitly in MI [23,40–42,50,60,61].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Curran, E.
Affiliations
Royal Hospital for Neuro-disability (GB)
Corresponding author
Curran, E
Venue
Brain and Cognition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-04
Volume
51
Issue
3
Pages
326-336
ISSN
0278-2626 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2102757742
Cited by
417
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 31 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 18
FWCI
3.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain and Cognition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
  • Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Free Will and Agency
Keywords
brain-computer interface, EEG signal generation, motor imagery, cognitive tasks, task selection
MeSH terms
Brain, Electroencephalography, Humans, Learning, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, User-Computer Interface

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review