The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Brain-computer interfaces for 1-D and 2-D cursor control: designs using volitional control of the EEG spectrum or steady-state visual evoked potentials
Open accessAbstract
We have developed and tested two electroencephalogram (EEG)-based brain-computer interfaces (BCI) for users to control a cursor on a computer display. Our system uses an adaptive algorithm, based on kernel partial least squares classification (KPLS), to associate patterns in multichannel EEG frequency spectra with cursor controls. Our first BCI, Target Practice, is a system for one-dimensional device control, in which participants use biofeedback to learn voluntary control of their EEG spectra. Target Practice uses a KPLS classifier to map power spectra of 62-electrode EEG signals to rightward or leftward position of a moving cursor on a computer display. Three subjects learned to control motion of a cursor on a video display in multiple blocks of 60 trials over periods of up to six weeks. The best subject's average skill in correct selection of the cursor direction grew from 58% to 88% after 13 training sessions. Target Practice also implements online control of two artifact sources: 1) removal of ocular artifact by linear subtraction of wavelet-smoothed vertical and horizontal electrooculograms (EOG) signals, 2) control of muscle artifact by inhibition of BCI training during periods of relatively high power in the 40-64 Hz band. The second BCI, Think Pointer, is a system for two-dimensional cursor control. Steady-state visual evoked potentials (SSVEP) are triggered by four flickering checkerboard stimuli located in narrow strips at each edge of the display. The user attends to one of the four beacons to initiate motion in the desired direction. The SSVEP signals are recorded from 12 electrodes located over the occipital region. A KPLS classifier is individually calibrated to map multichannel frequency bands of the SSVEP signals to right-left or up-down motion of a cursor on a computer display. The display stops moving when the user attends to a central fixation point. As for Target Practice, Think Pointer also implements wavelet-based online removal of ocular artifact; however, in Think Pointer muscle artifact is controlled via adaptive normalization of the SSVEP. Training of the classifier requires about 3 min. We have tested our system in real-time operation in three human subjects. Across subjects and sessions, control accuracy ranged from 80% to 100% correct with lags of 1-5 s for movement initiation and turning. We have also developed a realistic demonstration of our system for control of a moving map display (http://ti.arc.nasa.gov/).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact
Gratton, G., Coles, M. G. H., & Donchin, E. (1983) · Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/0013-4694(83)90135-9 · Cited by 5,055 · cited 1×
“Our approach used an established linear subtraction method [ 10 ] with an added step of wavelet denoising the EOG signals so that real-time subtraction (no averaging) would minimize subtraction of EEG signals recorded near the eyes [11].”
Method
Cited by
Steady-state visually evoked potentials: Focus on essential paradigms and future perspectives
Vialatte, F.-B., Maurice, M., Dauwels, J., & Cichocki, A. (2010) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2009.11.005 · Cited by 1,066
Bin, G., Gao, X., Yan, Z., Hong, B., & Gao, S. (2009) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2560/6/4/046002 · Cited by 773
A Survey of Stimulation Methods Used in SSVEP-Based BCIs
Zhu, D., Bieger, J., Garcia Molina, G., & Aarts, R. M. (2010) · Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience · doi:10.1155/2010/702357 · Cited by 654
Brain-Computer Interfaces Based on Visual Evoked Potentials
Wang, Y., Gao, X., Hong, B., Jia, C., & Gao, S. (2008) · IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine · doi:10.1109/memb.2008.923958 · Cited by 423
Feature Extraction and Classification Methods for Hybrid fNIRS-EEG Brain-Computer Interfaces
Hong, K.-S., Khan, M. J., & Hong, M. J. (2018) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2018.00246 · Cited by 283
Metadata
- Authors
- Trejo, L. J., Rosipal, R., & Matthews, B.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
- Published
- 2006-06
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 225-229
- ISSN
- 1534-4320 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-0210
- OpenAlex
- W2119683973
- Cited by
- 267
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Brain-computer interfaces for 1-D and 2-D cursor control: designs using volitional control of the EEG spectrum or steady-state visual evoked potentials. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tnsre.2006.875578
- The paper
- Trejo, L. J., Rosipal, R., & Matthews, B. (2006). Brain-computer interfaces for 1-D and 2-D cursor control: designs using volitional control of the EEG spectrum or steady-state visual evoked potentials. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1109/tnsre.2006.875578
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.