The DOI matches its Crossref record; 163 of the 163 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Feature Extraction and Classification Methods for Hybrid fNIRS-EEG Brain-Computer Interfaces
Open accessAbstract
In this study, a brain-computer interface (BCI) framework for hybrid functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) and electroencephalography (EEG) for locked-in syndrome (LIS) patients is investigated. Brain tasks, channel selection methods, and feature extraction and classification algorithms available in the literature are reviewed. First, we categorize various types of patients with cognitive and motor impairments to assess the suitability of BCI for each of them. The prefrontal cortex is identified as a suitable brain region for imaging. Second, the brain activity that contributes to the generation of hemodynamic signals is reviewed. Mental arithmetic and word formation tasks are found to be suitable for use with LIS patients. Third, since a specific targeted brain region is needed for BCI, methods for determining the region of interest are reviewed. The combination of a bundled-optode configuration and threshold-integrated vector phase analysis turns out to be a promising solution. Fourth, the usable fNIRS features and EEG features are reviewed. For hybrid BCI, a combination of the signal peak and mean fNIRS signals and the highest band powers of EEG signals is promising. For classification, linear discriminant analysis has been most widely used. However, further research on vector phase analysis as a classifier for multiple commands is desirable. Overall, proper brain region identification and proper selection of features will improve classification accuracy. In conclusion, five future research issues are identified, and a new BCI scheme, including brain therapy for LIS patients and using the framework of hybrid fNIRS-EEG BCI, is provided.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
1 retracted
Brain–computer interface–based communication in the completely locked-in State
Chaudhary, U., Xia, B., Silvoni, S., Cohen, L. G., & Birbaumer, N. (2017) · PLOS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1002593 · Cited by 235
RetractedThe Brain's Default Network: Anatomy, Function, and Relevance to Disease
Buckner, R. L., Andrews‐Hanna, J. R., & Schacter, D. L. (2008) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1196/annals.1440.011 · Cited by 9,761
A review of classification algorithms for EEG-based brain–computer interfaces
Lotte, F., Congedo, M., Lécuyer, A., Lamarche, F., & Arnaldi, B. (2007) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2560/4/2/r01 · Cited by 2,665
Brain Computer Interfaces, a Review
Nicolas-Alonso, L. F., & Gomez-Gil, J. (2012) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s120201211 · Cited by 2,143
Jurcak, V., Tsuzuki, D., & Dan, I. (2007) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.09.024 · Cited by 1,489
Cerebral location of international 10–20 system electrode placement
Homan, R. W., Herman, J., & Purdy, P. (1987) · Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/0013-4694(87)90206-9 · Cited by 1,407
NIRS-SPM: Statistical parametric mapping for near-infrared spectroscopy
YE, J., TAK, S., JANG, K., JUNG, J., & JANG, J. (2009) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.08.036 · Cited by 1,180
fNIRS-based brain-computer interfaces: a review
Naseer, N., & Hong, K.-S. (2015) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2015.00003 · Cited by 988
Self-citationZander, T. O., & Kothe, C. (2011) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2560/8/2/025005 · Cited by 887
Enhanced performance by a hybrid NIRS–EEG brain computer interface
Fazli, S., Mehnert, J., Steinbrink, J., Curio, G., Villringer, A., Müller, K.-R., & Blankertz, B. (2012) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.07.084 · Cited by 599
Cited by
Chen, W.-L., Wagner, J., Heugel, N., Sugar, J., Lee, Y.-W., Conant, L., Malloy, M., Heffernan, J., Quirk, B., Zinos, A., et al. (2020) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2020.00724 · Cited by 382
Kesedzic, I., Sarlija, M., Bozek, J., Popovic, S., & Cosic, K. (2021) · IEEE Sensors Journal · doi:10.1109/jsen.2020.3038032 · Cited by 29
Metadata
- Authors
- Hong, K.-S., Khan, M. J., & Hong, M. J.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2018-06-28
- Volume
- 12
- Pages
- 246-246
- ISSN
- 1662-5161 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2811153207
- Cited by
- 283
- References
- 163
- FWCI
- 18.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Feature Extraction and Classification Methods for Hybrid fNIRS-EEG Brain-Computer Interfaces. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3389/fnhum.2018.00246
- The paper
- Hong, K.-S., Khan, M. J., & Hong, M. J. (2018). Feature Extraction and Classification Methods for Hybrid fNIRS-EEG Brain-Computer Interfaces. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2018.00246
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.