Sensor Evaluation for Wearable Strain Gauges in Neurological Rehabilitation
Abstract
Conductive elastomers are a novel strain sensing technology which can be unobtrusively embedded into a garment's fabric, allowing a new type of sensorized cloths for motion analysis. A possible application for this technology is remote monitoring and control of motor rehabilitation exercises. The present work describes a sensorized shirt for upper limb posture recognition. Supervised learning techniques have been employed to compare classification models for the analysis of strains, simultaneously measured at multiple points of the shirt. The instantaneous position of the limb was classified into a finite set of predefined postures, and the movement was decomposed in an ordered sequence of discrete states. The amount of information given by the observation of each sensor during the execution of a specific exercise was quantitatively estimated by computing the information gain for each sensor, which in turn allows the data-driven optimization of the garment. Real-time feedback on exercise progress can also be provided by reconstructing the sequence of consecutive positions assumed by the limb.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A project that was part of the myHeart initiative led to the development of a sensorized garment-based system to facilitate rehabilitation interventions in the home setting.
“A project that was part of the myHeart initiative [97,98] led to the development of a sensorized garment-based system to facilitate rehabilitation interventions in the home setting.”
From A review of wearable sensors and systems with application in rehabilitation (2012) · cites this paper as [97]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 35 · Cited by 100
- Authors
- Giorgino, T., Tormene, P., Lorussi, F., De Rossi, D., & Quaglini, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Pavia (IT)
- University of Pisa (IT)
- ORCID
- Quaglini, Silvana
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
- Published
- 2009-08
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 409-415
- ISSN
- 1534-4320 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-0210
- OpenAlex
- W2114680254
- Cited by
- 100
- References
- 35
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 5.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- CINECA IRIS Institutial research information system (University of Pisa) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
- Keywords
- conductive elastomers, wearable strain sensors, motor rehabilitation
- MeSH terms
- Clothing, Equipment Design, Humans, Nervous System Diseases, Posture, Sensitivity and Specificity, Transducers, Reproducibility of Results, Monitoring, Ambulatory, Equipment Failure Analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review