Cited by 124EEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesEpilepsy research and treatmentMachine Learning in Healthcare

B2-ViT net: broad vision transformer network with broad attention for seizure prediction

Open access
Shi, Shuiling, Liu, Wenqi·2024·IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering

Abstract

Seizure prediction are necessary for epileptic patients. The global spatial interactions among channels, and long-range temporal dependencies play a crucial role in seizure onset prediction. In addition, it is necessary to search for seizure prediction features in a vast space to learn new generalized feature representations. Many previous deep learning algorithms have achieved some results in automatic seizure prediction. However, most of them do not consider global spatial interactions among channels and long-range temporal dependencies together, and only learn the feature representation in the deep space. To tackle these issues, in this study, an novel bi-level programming seizure prediction model, B2-ViT Net, is proposed for learning the new generalized spatio-temporal long-range correlation features, which can characterize the global interactions among channels in spatial, and long-range dependencies in temporal required for seizure prediction. In addition, the proposed model can comprehensively learn generalized seizure prediction features in a vast space due to its strong deep and broad feature search capabilities. Sufficient experiments are conducted on two public datasets, CHB-MIT and Kaggle datasets. Compared with other existing methods, our proposed model has shown promising results in automatic seizure prediction tasks, and provides a certain degree of interpretability.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tnsre.2023.3346955

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Multimodal systems have shown promise in delivering fairer and more equitable care by incorporating broader patient contexts, reducing disparities.

    “Furthermore, multimodal systems have shown promise in delivering fairer and more equitable care, as they can incorporate broader patient contexts, reducing disparities that often arise when models are trained on limited or homogeneous data (10–12).”

    From The role of multimodality in clinical disease diagnosis: advances, challenges, and opportunities (2026) · cites this paper as [12]

    The paper’s Limitations and Future Directions section discusses a patient-dependent EEG seizure-prediction model that cannot yet be applied across patients. Searches for multimodal systems, equitable care, bias, and disparities found no passage addressing whether broader patient contexts reduce disparities. The indexed passages provide no page numbers. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. A. Dosovitskiy, L. Beyer, A. Kolesnikov, D. Weissenborn, X. Zhai, T. Unterthiner, M. Dehghani, M. Minderer, G. Heigold, S. Gelly, J. Uszkoreit, and N. Houlsby, "An image is worth 16x16 words: Trans- formers for image recognition at scale," in Int. Conf. Learn. Represent., 2021.
  2. Y. Zhang, Y. Guo, P. Yang, W. Chen, and B. Lo, "Epilepsy seizure prediction on eeg using common spatial pattern and convolutional neural network," IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inform., vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 465-474, 2020.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shi, S., & Liu, W.
Affiliations
Kunming University of Science and Technology (CN)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
Published
2024
Volume
32
Pages
178-188
ISSN
  • 1534-4320 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-0210
OpenAlex
W4390204163
Cited by
124
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 77 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 8
FWCI
18.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (12371460)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Epilepsy research and treatment
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
Keywords
seizure prediction, epilepsy, vision transformer, long-range temporal dependencies, spatiotemporal feature learning, bi-level optimization, EEG, CHB-MIT, interpretability
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Electroencephalography, Humans, Electric Power Supplies, Seizures

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review