Cited by 94Teleoperation and Haptic SystemsMotor Control and AdaptationRobot Manipulation and Learning

The Task-Dependent Efficacy of Shared-Control Haptic Guidance Paradigms

Powell, Dane, O'Malley, Marcia K.·2012·IEEE Transactions on Haptics

Abstract

Shared-control haptic guidance is a common form of robot-mediated training used to teach novice subjects to perform dynamic tasks. Shared-control guidance is distinct from more traditional guidance controllers, such as virtual fixtures, in that it provides novices with real-time visual and haptic feedback from a real or virtual expert. Previous studies have shown varying levels of training efficacy using shared-control guidance paradigms; it is hypothesized that these mixed results are due to interactions between specific guidance implementations ("paradigms") and tasks. This work proposes a novel guidance paradigm taxonomy intended to help classify and compare the multitude of implementations in the literature, as well as a revised proxy rendering model to allow for the implementation of more complex guidance paradigms. The efficacies of four common paradigms are compared in a controlled study with 50 healthy subjects and two dynamic tasks. The results show that guidance paradigms must be matched to a task's dynamic characteristics to elicit effective training and low workload. Based on these results, we provide suggestions for the future development of improved haptic guidance paradigms.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/toh.2012.40

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Reliance on haptic guidance might be reduced using assist-as-needed or fading feedback.

    “Reliance on haptic guidance might be reduced using paradigms like assist-as-needed or fading feedback (Marchal-Crespo & Reinkensmeyer, 2009;Patoglu, Li, & O'Malley, 2009;Powell & O'Malley, 2012).”

    From Augmented visual, auditory, haptic, and multimodal feedback in motor learning: A review (2013) · cites this paper as Powell & O'Malley, 2012

  • Haptic guidance may help beginners learn complex sportive movements in a safe and self-explanatory way.

    “Haptic guidance may help beginners to learn complex (sportive) movements in a safe and self-explanatory way (Powell & O'Malley, 2012).”

    From Augmented visual, auditory, haptic, and multimodal feedback in motor learning: A review (2013) · cites this paper as Powell & O'Malley, 2012

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 49 · Cited by 94

Authors
Powell, D., & O'Malley, M. K.
Affiliations
Rice University (US)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Haptics
Published
2012
Volume
5
Issue
3
Pages
208-219
ISSN
1939-1412 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2019526129
Cited by
94
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 1
FWCI
11.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Haptics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Rice University
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Teleoperation and Haptic Systems
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robot Manipulation and Learning
Keywords
dynamic tasks, haptic feedback, workload

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review