The Task-Dependent Efficacy of Shared-Control Haptic Guidance Paradigms
Abstract
Shared-control haptic guidance is a common form of robot-mediated training used to teach novice subjects to perform dynamic tasks. Shared-control guidance is distinct from more traditional guidance controllers, such as virtual fixtures, in that it provides novices with real-time visual and haptic feedback from a real or virtual expert. Previous studies have shown varying levels of training efficacy using shared-control guidance paradigms; it is hypothesized that these mixed results are due to interactions between specific guidance implementations ("paradigms") and tasks. This work proposes a novel guidance paradigm taxonomy intended to help classify and compare the multitude of implementations in the literature, as well as a revised proxy rendering model to allow for the implementation of more complex guidance paradigms. The efficacies of four common paradigms are compared in a controlled study with 50 healthy subjects and two dynamic tasks. The results show that guidance paradigms must be matched to a task's dynamic characteristics to elicit effective training and low workload. Based on these results, we provide suggestions for the future development of improved haptic guidance paradigms.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Reliance on haptic guidance might be reduced using assist-as-needed or fading feedback.
“Reliance on haptic guidance might be reduced using paradigms like assist-as-needed or fading feedback (Marchal-Crespo & Reinkensmeyer, 2009;Patoglu, Li, & O'Malley, 2009;Powell & O'Malley, 2012).”
From Augmented visual, auditory, haptic, and multimodal feedback in motor learning: A review (2013) · cites this paper as Powell & O'Malley, 2012
Haptic guidance may help beginners learn complex sportive movements in a safe and self-explanatory way.
“Haptic guidance may help beginners to learn complex (sportive) movements in a safe and self-explanatory way (Powell & O'Malley, 2012).”
From Augmented visual, auditory, haptic, and multimodal feedback in motor learning: A review (2013) · cites this paper as Powell & O'Malley, 2012
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 49 · Cited by 94
- Authors
- Powell, D., & O'Malley, M. K.
- Affiliations
- Rice University (US)
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Haptics
- Published
- 2012
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 208-219
- ISSN
- 1939-1412 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2019526129
- Cited by
- 94
- References
- 49
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 11.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Haptics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- Rice University
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Teleoperation and Haptic Systems
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robot Manipulation and Learning
- Keywords
- dynamic tasks, haptic feedback, workload
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review