The DOI matches its Crossref record; 89 of the 89 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Application of Psychophysical Techniques to Haptic Research
Abstract
Various psychophysical methods have been used to study human haptic perception, although the selection of a particular method is often based on convention, rather than an analysis of which technique is optimal for the question being addressed. In this review, classical psychophysical techniques used to measure sensory thresholds are described as well as more modern methods such as adaptive procedures and those associated with signal detection theory. Details are provided as to how these techniques should be implemented to measure absolute and difference thresholds and factors that influence subjects' responses are noted. In addition to the methods used to measure sensory thresholds, the techniques available for measuring the perception of suprathreshold stimuli are presented. These scaling methods are reviewed in the context of the various stimulus and response biases that influence how subjects respond to stimuli. The importance of understanding the factors that influence perceptual processing is highlighted throughout the review with reference to experimental studies of haptic perception.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information.
Miller, G. A. (1956) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0043158 · Cited by 17,812
The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information.
Miller, G. A. (1994) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.101.2.343 · Cited by 17,161
Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion
BORG, G. A. V. (1982) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1249/00005768-198205000-00012 · Cited by 16,580
A Stochastic Approximation Method
Robbins, H., & Monro, S. (1951) · The Annals of Mathematical Statistics · doi:10.1214/aoms/1177729586 · Cited by 9,643
Transformed Up-Down Methods in Psychoacoustics
Levitt, H. (1971) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.1912375 · Cited by 5,477
Detection Theory: A User's Guide
Macmillan, N. A., & Creelman, C. D. (1991) · Cited by 5,415
The validation of visual analogue scales as ratio scale measures for chronic and experimental pain
Price, D. D., McGrath, P. A., Rafii, A., & Buckingham, B. (1983) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(83)90126-4 · Cited by 3,921
Stevens, S. S. (1957) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0046162 · Cited by 3,361
Torgerson, W. S. (1958) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,920
The psychometric function: I. Fitting, sampling, and goodness of fit
Wichmann, F. A., & Hill, N. J. (2001) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03194544 · Cited by 2,358
Cited by
Tacttoo: A Thin and Feel-Through Tattoo for On-Skin Tactile Output
Withana, A., Groeger, D., & Steimle, J. (2018) · Proceedings of the 31st Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology · doi:10.1145/3242587.3242645 · Cited by 187
MH-Pen: A Pen-type Multi-mode Haptic Interface for Touch Screens Interaction
Chen, D., Song, A., Tian, L., Yu, Y., & Zhu, L. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Haptics · doi:10.1109/toh.2018.2826551 · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Authors
- Jones, L. A., & Tan, H. Z.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Haptics
- Published
- 2013-07
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 268-284
- ISSN
- 1939-1412 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1978703524
- Cited by
- 278
- References
- 89
- FWCI
- 2.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Application of Psychophysical Techniques to Haptic Research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/toh.2012.74
- The paper
- Jones, L. A., & Tan, H. Z. (2013). Application of Psychophysical Techniques to Haptic Research. IEEE Transactions on Haptics. https://doi.org/10.1109/toh.2012.74
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.