MH-Pen: A Pen-type Multi-mode Haptic Interface for Touch Screens Interaction
Abstract
Touch screen technology supplies a new approach to interact with virtual environments. For haptic interaction on a touch screen, haptic devices that are capable of simultaneously conveying tactile and force information to users are highly desired for enhancing the sense of reality and immersion. To this end, a prototype haptic interface, called MH-Pen, was developed and fabricated to display the virtual interactive information through multi-mode haptic feedback. The MH-Pen is a self-contained system that provides vibrotactile feedback and precise force feedback by integrating three types of actuators. In this paper, MH-Pen's design, specifications, and working principle are described. Subsequently, to accurately display the interaction force, a hybrid actuator was designed by combining a piston-type magnetorheological (MR) actuator and a voice coil motor (VCM), and a closed-loop control scheme was built to manage the hybrid actuator. Finally, we objectively and subjectively evaluated the force feedback performance and the effect of multi-mode haptic display of the MH-Pen through physical measurements and psychophysical experiments of virtual surface stiffness display. The results show that improving the precision of force feedback and using multi-mode haptic display are both useful and necessary to enhance the sense of human-computer interaction realism.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The finger movement required to reach and press a key is simpler and more intuitive than handwriting, lacks any graphomotor component, and has no direct relationship to the shape of the letter.
“Unlike handwriting, the finger movement required to reach and press a key is simpler and more intuitive, lacking any graphomotor component. It has no direct relationship to the shape of the letter [16].”
From The Neuroscience Behind Writing: Handwriting vs. Typing—Who Wins the Battle? (2025) · cites this paper as [16]
Handwriting is a dynamic motor process that engages a network of brain regions primarily associated with motor control, visuospatial coordination, and language processing.
“Handwriting is a dynamic motor process that engages a network of brain regions primarily associated with motor control, visuospatial coordination, and language processing.”
From The Neuroscience Behind Writing: Handwriting vs. Typing—Who Wins the Battle? (2025) · cites this paper as [16]
Studies employing fMRI and TMS have identified the primary motor cortex, premotor cortex, supplementary motor area (SMA), and cerebellum as core areas controlling the execution and refinement of handwriting movements.
“Studies employing fMRI and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) have identified in the primary motor cortex, the premotor cortex, the supplementary motor area (SMA), and the cerebellum as the core areas controlling the execution and refinement of handwriting movements.”
From The Neuroscience Behind Writing: Handwriting vs. Typing—Who Wins the Battle? (2025) · cites this paper as [16]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Yang, T., Kim, J. R., Jin, H., Gil, H., Koo, J., & Kim, H. J. (2021) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.202008831 · Cited by 178 · see citing works
The Neuroscience Behind Writing: Handwriting vs. Typing—Who Wins the Battle?
Marano, G., Kotzalidis, G. D., Lisci, F. M., Anesini, M. B., Rossi, S., Barbonetti, S., Cangini, A., Ronsisvalle, A., Artuso, L., Falsini, C., et al. (2025) · Life · doi:10.3390/life15030345 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
- Authors
- Chen, D., Song, A., Tian, L., Yu, Y., & Zhu, L.
- Affiliations
- State Key Laboratory of Digital Medical Engineering (CN)
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Haptics
- Published
- 2018
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1-1
- ISSN
- 1939-1412 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2802031223
- Cited by
- 28
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4
- FWCI
- 2.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Haptics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFB1001301)
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (61502096, 91648206)
- Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities and the Innovation Plan for Graduate Students in the Universities of Jiangsu Province (KYLX16_0190)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Teleoperation and Haptic Systems
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Interactive and Immersive Displays
- Keywords
- haptic interface, touchscreen interaction, vibrotactile feedback, force feedback, hybrid actuator, magnetorheological actuators, voice coil motor, feedback control
- MeSH terms
- Equipment Design, Humans, Man-Machine Systems, User-Computer Interface, Touch Perception, Feedback, Sensory
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review