Cited by 28Teleoperation and Haptic SystemsTactile and Sensory InteractionsInteractive and Immersive Displays

MH-Pen: A Pen-type Multi-mode Haptic Interface for Touch Screens Interaction

Chen, Dapeng, Song, Aiguo, Tian, Lei, Yu, Yuqing, Zhu, Lifeng·2018·IEEE Transactions on Haptics

Abstract

Touch screen technology supplies a new approach to interact with virtual environments. For haptic interaction on a touch screen, haptic devices that are capable of simultaneously conveying tactile and force information to users are highly desired for enhancing the sense of reality and immersion. To this end, a prototype haptic interface, called MH-Pen, was developed and fabricated to display the virtual interactive information through multi-mode haptic feedback. The MH-Pen is a self-contained system that provides vibrotactile feedback and precise force feedback by integrating three types of actuators. In this paper, MH-Pen's design, specifications, and working principle are described. Subsequently, to accurately display the interaction force, a hybrid actuator was designed by combining a piston-type magnetorheological (MR) actuator and a voice coil motor (VCM), and a closed-loop control scheme was built to manage the hybrid actuator. Finally, we objectively and subjectively evaluated the force feedback performance and the effect of multi-mode haptic display of the MH-Pen through physical measurements and psychophysical experiments of virtual surface stiffness display. The results show that improving the precision of force feedback and using multi-mode haptic display are both useful and necessary to enhance the sense of human-computer interaction realism.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/toh.2018.2826551

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The finger movement required to reach and press a key is simpler and more intuitive than handwriting, lacks any graphomotor component, and has no direct relationship to the shape of the letter.

    “Unlike handwriting, the finger movement required to reach and press a key is simpler and more intuitive, lacking any graphomotor component. It has no direct relationship to the shape of the letter [16].”
  • Handwriting is a dynamic motor process that engages a network of brain regions primarily associated with motor control, visuospatial coordination, and language processing.

    “Handwriting is a dynamic motor process that engages a network of brain regions primarily associated with motor control, visuospatial coordination, and language processing.”
  • Studies employing fMRI and TMS have identified the primary motor cortex, premotor cortex, supplementary motor area (SMA), and cerebellum as core areas controlling the execution and refinement of handwriting movements.

    “Studies employing fMRI and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) have identified in the primary motor cortex, the premotor cortex, the supplementary motor area (SMA), and the cerebellum as the core areas controlling the execution and refinement of handwriting movements.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chen, D., Song, A., Tian, L., Yu, Y., & Zhu, L.
Affiliations
State Key Laboratory of Digital Medical Engineering (CN)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Haptics
Published
2018
Volume
11
Issue
4
Pages
1-1
ISSN
1939-1412 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2802031223
Cited by
28
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4
FWCI
2.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Haptics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFB1001301)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (61502096, 91648206)
  • Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities and the Innovation Plan for Graduate Students in the Universities of Jiangsu Province (KYLX16_0190)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Teleoperation and Haptic Systems
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Interactive and Immersive Displays
Keywords
haptic interface, touchscreen interaction, vibrotactile feedback, force feedback, hybrid actuator, magnetorheological actuators, voice coil motor, feedback control
MeSH terms
Equipment Design, Humans, Man-Machine Systems, User-Computer Interface, Touch Perception, Feedback, Sensory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review