SwarmTouch: Guiding a Swarm of Micro-Quadrotors With Impedance Control Using a Wearable Tactile Interface
Open accessAbstract
To achieve a smooth and safe guiding of a drone formation by a human operator, we propose a novel interaction strategy for a human-swarm communication, which combines impedance control and vibrotactile feedback. The presented approach takes into account the human hand velocity and changes the formation shape and dynamics accordingly using impedance interlinks simulated between quadrotors, which helps to achieve a natural swarm behavior. Several tactile patterns representing static and dynamic parameters of the swarm are proposed. The user feels the state of the swarm at the fingertips and receives valuable information to improve the controllability of the complex formation. A user study revealed the patterns with high recognition rates. A flight experiment demonstrated the possibility to accurately navigate the formation in a cluttered environment using only tactile feedback. Subjects stated that tactile sensation allows guiding the drone formation through obstacles and makes the human-swarm communication more interactive. The proposed technology can potentially have a strong impact on the human-swarm interaction, providing a higher level of awareness during the swarm navigation.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The abovementioned properties (fault tolerance, scalability, robustness, flexibility, adaptivity) have been demonstrated using mathematical models, abstract particle systems, or multiagent systems in the context of swarms performing different behaviors.
“The abovementioned properties have been demonstrated using mathematical models, abstract particle systems, or multiagent systems in the context of swarms performing different behaviors (e.g., aggregation [70], collective motion [71], collective decision-making [20], and pattern formation [72]).”
From Swarm Robotics: Past, Present, and Future [Point of View] (2021) · cites this paper as [72]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Swarm Robotics: Past, Present, and Future [Point of View]
Dorigo, M., Theraulaz, G., & Trianni, V. (2021) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2021.3072740 · Cited by 401 · see citing works
- Authors
- Tsykunov, E., Agishev, R., Ibrahimov, R., Labazanova, L., Tleugazy, A., & Tsetserukou, D.
- Affiliations
- Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology (RU)
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Haptics
- Published
- 2019-07-01
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 363-374
- ISSN
- 1939-1412 (ISSN-L)
- 2329-4051
- 2334-0134
- OpenAlex
- W2971898048
- Cited by
- 50
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5
- FWCI
- 3.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Haptics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Teleoperation and Haptic Systems
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Interactive and Immersive Displays
- Keywords
- micro quadrotor, UAV swarms, human-swarm interaction, impedance control, vibrotactile feedback, swarm navigation, obstacle avoidance
- MeSH terms
- Wearable Electronic Devices, Adolescent, Adult, Equipment Design, Female, Humans, Male, Physical Stimulation, Robotics, Touch, User-Computer Interface, Vibration, Electric Impedance, Touch Perception, Young Adult, Feedback, Sensory, Wireless Technology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review