The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Stable real-time 3D tracking using online and offline information
Open accessAbstract
We propose an efficient real-time solution for tracking rigid objects in 3D using a single camera that can handle large camera displacements, drastic aspect changes, and partial occlusions. While commercial products are already available for offline camera registration, robust online tracking remains an open issue because many real-time algorithms described in the literature still lack robustness and are prone to drift and jitter. To address these problems, we have formulated the tracking problem in terms of local bundle adjustment and have developed a method for establishing image correspondences that can equally well handle short and wide-baseline matching. We then can merge the information from preceding frames with that provided by a very limited number of keyframes created during a training stage, which results in a real-time tracker that does not jitter or drift and can deal with significant aspect changes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Distinctive Image Features from Scale-Invariant Keypoints
Lowe, D. G. (2004) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1023/b:visi.0000029664.99615.94 · Cited by 55,589
Multiple View Geometry in Computer Vision
Hartley, R., & Zisserman, A. (2004) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511811685 · Cited by 21,070
A Combined Corner and Edge Detector
Harris, C., & Stephens, M. (1988) · Procedings of the Alvey Vision Conference 1988 · doi:10.5244/c.2.23 · Cited by 12,901
Huber, P. J. (1981) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/0471725250 · Cited by 7,066
Efficient region tracking with parametric models of geometry and illumination
Hager, G. D., & Belhumeur, P. N. (1998) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/34.722606 · Cited by 1,066
An efficient solution to the five-point relative pose problem
Nister, D. (2003) · 2003 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2003. Proceedings. · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2003.1211470 · Cited by 279
Cited by
Kalal, Z., Mikolajczyk, K., & Matas, J. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2011.239 · Cited by 3,285
Fusing points and lines for high performance tracking
Rosten, E., & Drummond, T. (2005) · Tenth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV'05) Volume 1 · doi:10.1109/iccv.2005.104 · Cited by 1,119
Pose estimation for augmented reality: a hands-on survey
Marchand, E., Uchiyama, H., & Spindler, F. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics · doi:10.1109/tvcg.2015.2513408 · Cited by 746
Monocular model-based 3D tracking of rigid objects: a survey
Lepetit, V., & Fua, P. (2005) · Foundations and Trends® in Computer Graphics and Vision · doi:10.1561/0600000001 · Cited by 484
Self-citationComputer Vision and Image Processing: A Paper Review
Wiley, V., & Lucas, T. (2018) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · doi:10.29099/ijair.v2i1.42 · Cited by 298
Metadata
- Authors
- Vacchetti, L., Lepetit, V., & Fua, P.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
- Published
- 2004-10
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1385-1391
- ISSN
- 0162-8828 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2108940975
- Cited by
- 328
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 23.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.