The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Precision range image registration using a robust surface interpenetration measure and enhanced genetic algorithms
Abstract
This paper addresses the range image registration problem for views having low overlap and which may include substantial noise. The current state of the art in range image registration is best represented by the well-known iterative closest point (ICP) algorithm and numerous variations on it. Although this method is effective in many domains, it nevertheless suffers from two key limitations: It requires prealignment of the range surfaces to a reasonable starting point and it is not robust to outliers arising either from noise or low surface overlap. This paper proposes a new approach that avoids these problems. To that end, there are two key, novel contributions in this work: a new, hybrid genetic algorithm (GA) technique, including hillclimbing and parallel-migration, combined with a new, robust evaluation metric based on surface interpenetration. Up to now, interpenetration has been evaluated only qualitatively; we define the first quantitative measure for it. Because they search in a space of transformations, GAs are capable of registering surfaces even when there is low overlap between them and without need for prealignment. The novel GA search algorithm we present offers much faster convergence than prior GA methods, while the new robust evaluation metric ensures more precise alignments, even in the presence of significant noise, than mean squared error or other well-known robust cost functions. The paper presents thorough experimental results to show the improvements realized by these two contributions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Object modeling by registration of multiple range images
Chen, Y., & Medioni, G. (2002) · Proceedings. 1991 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation · doi:10.1109/robot.1991.132043 · Cited by 1,409
Cited by
Image Matching from Handcrafted to Deep Features: A Survey
Ma, J., Jiang, X., Fan, A., Jiang, J., & Yan, J. (2021) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-020-01359-2 · Cited by 990
A Review of Point Cloud Registration Algorithms for Mobile Robotics
Pomerleau, F., Colas, F., & Siegwart, R. (2015) · Foundations and Trends® in Robotics · doi:10.1561/2300000035 · Cited by 717
Registration of 3D Point Clouds and Meshes: A Survey from Rigid to Nonrigid
Tam, G. K. L., Cheng, Z.-Q., Lai, Y.-K., Langbein, F. C., Liu, Y., Marshall, D., Martin, R. R., Sun, X.-F., & Rosin, P. L. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics · doi:10.1109/tvcg.2012.310 · Cited by 679
A review of multimodal image matching: Methods and applications
Jiang, X., Ma, J., Xiao, G., Shao, Z., & Guo, X. (2021) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2021.02.012 · Cited by 532
FakeCatcher: Detection of Synthetic Portrait Videos using Biological Signals
Ciftci, U. A., Demir, I., & Yin, L. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2020.3009287 · Cited by 499
Metadata
- Authors
- Silva, L., Bellon, O. R. P., & Boyer, K. L.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
- Published
- 2005-05
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 762-776
- ISSN
- 0162-8828 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2131684094
- Cited by
- 222
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Precision range image registration using a robust surface interpenetration measure and enhanced genetic algorithms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tpami.2005.108
- The paper
- Silva, L., Bellon, O. R. P., & Boyer, K. L. (2005). Precision range image registration using a robust surface interpenetration measure and enhanced genetic algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1109/tpami.2005.108
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.