The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Matching shape sequences in video with applications in human movement analysis
Abstract
We present an approach for comparing two sequences of deforming shapes using both parametric models and nonparametric methods. In our approach, Kendall's definition of shape is used for feature extraction. Since the shape feature rests on a non-Euclidean manifold, we propose parametric models like the autoregressive model and autoregressive moving average model on the tangent space and demonstrate the ability of these models to capture the nature of shape deformations using experiments on gait-based human recognition. The nonparametric model is based on Dynamic Time-Warping. We suggest a modification of the Dynamic time-warping algorithm to include the nature of the non-Euclidean space in which the shape deformations take place. We also show the efficacy of this algorithm by its application to gait-based human recognition. We exploit the shape deformations of a person's silhouette as a discriminating feature and provide recognition results using the nonparametric model. Our analysis leads to some interesting observations on the role of shape and kinematics in automated gait-based person authentication.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Golub, G. (2012) · doi:10.56021/9781421407944 · Cited by 34,505
Cited by
A survey on vision-based human action recognition
Poppe, R. (2010) · Image and Vision Computing · doi:10.1016/j.imavis.2009.11.014 · Cited by 2,242
From action to activity: Sensor-based activity recognition
Liu, Y., Nie, L., Liu, L., & Rosenblum, D. S. (2016) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2015.08.096 · Cited by 486
A review of biometric technology along with trends and prospects
Unar, J. A., Seng, W. C., & Abbasi, A. (2014) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2014.01.016 · Cited by 404
Robust gait recognition: a comprehensive survey
Rida, I., Almaadeed, N., & Almaadeed, S. (2019) · IET Biometrics · doi:10.1049/iet-bmt.2018.5063 · Cited by 119
Movement Human Actions Recognition Based on Machine Learning
Xu, H., Li, L., Fang, M., & Zhang, F. (2018) · International Journal of Online and Biomedical Engineering (iJOE) · doi:10.3991/ijoe.v14i04.8513 · Cited by 34
Metadata
- Authors
- Veeraraghavan, A., Roy-Chowdhury, A. K., & Chellappa, R.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
- Published
- 2005-12
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1896-1909
- ISSN
- 0162-8828 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2107481936
- Cited by
- 333
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.