The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Generating Cancelable Fingerprint Templates
Abstract
Biometrics-based authentication systems offer obvious usability advantages over traditional password and token-based authentication schemes. However, biometrics raises several privacy concerns. A biometric is permanently associated with a user and cannot be changed. Hence, if a biometric identifier is compromised, it is lost forever and possibly for every application where the biometric is used. Moreover, if the same biometric is used in multiple applications, a user can potentially be tracked from one application to the next by cross-matching biometric databases. In this paper, we demonstrate several methods to generate multiple cancelable identifiers from fingerprint images to overcome these problems. In essence, a user can be given as many biometric identifiers as needed by issuing a new transformation "key." The identifiers can be cancelled and replaced when compromised. We empirically compare the performance of several algorithms such as Cartesian, polar, and surface folding transformations of the minutiae positions. It is demonstrated through multiple experiments that we can achieve revocability and prevent cross-matching of biometric databases. It is also shown that the transforms are noninvertible by demonstrating that it is computationally as hard to recover the original biometric identifier from a transformed version as by randomly guessing. Based on these empirical results and a theoretical analysis we conclude that feature-level cancelable biometric construction is practicable in large biometric deployments.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Surveying the Development of Biometric User Authentication on Mobile Phones
Meng, W., Wong, D. S., Furnell, S., & Zhou, J. (2015) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2014.2386915 · Cited by 300
Biometric template transformation: a security analysis
Nagar, A., Nandakumar, K., & Jain, A. K. (2010) · SPIE Proceedings · doi:10.1117/12.839976 · Cited by 167
Biometric authentication on a mobile device: a study of user effort, error and task disruption
Trewin, S., Swart, C., Koved, L., Martino, J., Singh, K., & Ben-David, S. (2012) · Proceedings of the 28th Annual Computer Security Applications Conference · doi:10.1145/2420950.2420976 · Cited by 118
Joint Biological ID : A Secure and Efficient Lightweight Biometric Authentication Scheme
Wang, H., Fan, K., Chen, H., Chen, Q., Zhang, K., Li, F., Li, H., & Yang, Y. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing · doi:10.1109/tdsc.2022.3186999 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Ratha, N. K., Chikkerur, S., Connell, J. H., & Bolle, R. M.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
- Published
- 2007-04
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 561-572
- ISSN
- 0162-8828 (ISSN-L)
- 2160-9292
- OpenAlex
- W2125587922
- Cited by
- 877
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 84.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Generating Cancelable Fingerprint Templates. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tpami.2007.1004
- The paper
- Ratha, N. K., Chikkerur, S., Connell, J. H., & Bolle, R. M. (2007). Generating Cancelable Fingerprint Templates. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1109/tpami.2007.1004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.