The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Approximate Labeling via Graph Cuts Based on Linear Programming
Abstract
A new framework is presented for both understanding and developing graph-cut-based combinatorial algorithms suitable for the approximate optimization of a very wide class of Markov Random Fields (MRFs) that are frequently encountered in computer vision. The proposed framework utilizes tools from the duality theory of linear programming in order to provide an alternative and more general view of state-of-the-art techniques like the \alpha-expansion algorithm, which is included merely as a special case. Moreover, contrary to \alpha-expansion, the derived algorithms generate solutions with guaranteed optimality properties for a much wider class of problems, for example, even for MRFs with nonmetric potentials. In addition, they are capable of providing per-instance suboptimality bounds in all occasions, including discrete MRFs with an arbitrary potential function. These bounds prove to be very tight in practice (that is, very close to 1), which means that the resulting solutions are almost optimal. Our algorithms' effectiveness is demonstrated by presenting experimental results on a variety of low-level vision tasks, such as stereo matching, image restoration, image completion, and optical flow estimation, as well as on synthetic problems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fast approximate energy minimization via graph cuts
Boykov, Y., Veksler, O., & Zabih, R. (2001) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/34.969114 · Cited by 6,988
Cited by
Deformable medical image registration: a survey
Sotiras, A., Davatzikos, C., & Paragios, N. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2013.2265603 · Cited by 1,587
“We are going to brie y present two methods that have been used in registration tasks, Fast-PD [409,410] and TRW-S [411].”
MethodMSM: a new flexible framework for Multimodal Surface Matching
Robinson, E. C., Jbabdi, S., Glasser, M. F., Andersson, J., Burgess, G. C., Harms, M. P., Smith, S. M., Van Essen, D. C., & Jenkinson, M. (2014) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.05.069 · Cited by 640
Segmentation of Moving Objects by Long Term Video Analysis
Ochs, P., Malik, J., & Brox, T. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2013.242 · Cited by 585
A review of multimodal image matching: Methods and applications
Jiang, X., Ma, J., Xiao, G., Shao, Z., & Guo, X. (2021) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2021.02.012 · Cited by 532
Segmentation of organs‐at‐risks in head and neck CT images using convolutional neural networks
Ibragimov, B., & Xing, L. (2017) · Medical Physics · doi:10.1002/mp.12045 · Cited by 502
Metadata
- Authors
- Komodakis, N., & Tziritas, G.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
- Published
- 2007-08
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1436-1453
- ISSN
- 0162-8828 (ISSN-L)
- 2160-9292
- OpenAlex
- W2119867409
- Cited by
- 227
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 20.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Approximate Labeling via Graph Cuts Based on Linear Programming. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tpami.2007.1061
- The paper
- Komodakis, N., & Tziritas, G. (2007). Approximate Labeling via Graph Cuts Based on Linear Programming. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1109/tpami.2007.1061
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.