The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Biometric Recognition Using 3D Ear Shape
Abstract
Previous works have shown that the ear is a promising candidate for biometric identification. However, in prior work, the preprocessing of ear images has had manual steps and algorithms have not necessarily handled problems caused by hair and earrings. We present a complete system for ear biometrics, including automated segmentation of the ear in a profile view image and 3D shape matching for recognition. We evaluated this system with the largest experimental study to date in ear biometrics, achieving a rank-one recognition rate of 97.8 percent for an identification scenario and an equal error rate of 1.2 percent for a verification scenario on a database of 415 subjects and 1,386 total probes.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Therefore, much like fingerprint and face recognition (Smeets et al. 2010(Smeets et al. , 2012)), ear recognition (Chen & Bhanu, 2007;Yan & Bowyer, 2007;Abaza et al. 2013) is an active field of research in biometrics (biometric authentication).”
From An investigation of matching symmetry in the human pinnae with possible implications for 3D ear recognition and sound localization (2015) · cites this paper as Yan & Bowyer, 2007
Citations
Cites
Snakes, shapes, and gradient vector flow
Xu, C., & Prince, J. L. (1998) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/83.661186 · Cited by 4,001
Research works printed but not linked: 29
- 10.1109/34.121791 · DOI
- 10.1016/0734-189X(86)90220-3 · DOI
- Bhanu, Human Ear Recognition in 3D, 91
- 10.1109/ICPR.2000.906202 · DOI
- 10.1109/TPAMI.2003.1227990 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/icpr.2004.1334594 · DOI
- 10.1109/ACVMOT.2005.38 · DOI
- 10.1016/0262-8856(92)90066-C · DOI
- 10.5565/rev/elcvia.108 · DOI
- 10.1007/11789239_7 · DOI
- 10.1016/1049-9660(91)90028-N · DOI
- 10.1016/s0262-8856(02)00128-2 · DOI
- 10.1109/CVPR.1988.196246 · DOI
- 10.1109/34.1000242 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0262-8856(02)00003-3 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cviu.2004.11.001 · DOI
- Iannarelli, 1989, Ear Identification
- 10.1007/BF00133570 · DOI
- 10.1016/0262-8856(92)90076-F · DOI
- Messer, 1999, XM2VTSDB: The Extended M2VTS Database, Audio and Video-Based Biometric Person Authentication, 72
- 10.1109/CCST.1999.797956 · DOI
- 10.1109/IM.1999.805346 · DOI
- 10.1109/AFGR.2004.1301525 · DOI
- 10.1109/34.643895 · DOI
- 10.1109/ICPR.2002.1044746 · DOI
- 10.1109/CVPR.2005.447 · DOI
- 10.1109/CVPR.2005.450 · DOI
- 10.1109/CEC.2002.1006240 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF01427149 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A review of biometric technology along with trends and prospects
Unar, J. A., Seng, W. C., & Abbasi, A. (2014) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2014.01.016 · Cited by 404
Biometric Recognition: An Overview
Jain, A. K., & Kumar, A. (2012) · The International Library of Ethics, Law and Technology · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-3892-8_3 · Cited by 176
Claes, P., Reijniers, J., Shriver, M. D., Snyders, J., Suetens, P., Nielandt, J., De Tré, G., & Vandermeulen, D. (2015) · Journal of Anatomy · doi:10.1111/joa.12252 · Cited by 32
Metadata
- Authors
- Yan, P., & Bowyer, K. W.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
- Published
- 2007-08
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1297-1308
- ISSN
- 0162-8828
- 2160-9292
- Cited by
- 294
- References
- 1
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review