Cited by 294

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Biometric Recognition Using 3D Ear Shape

Yan, Ping, Bowyer, Kevin W.·2007·IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence

Abstract

Previous works have shown that the ear is a promising candidate for biometric identification. However, in prior work, the preprocessing of ear images has had manual steps and algorithms have not necessarily handled problems caused by hair and earrings. We present a complete system for ear biometrics, including automated segmentation of the ear in a profile view image and 3D shape matching for recognition. We evaluated this system with the largest experimental study to date in ear biometrics, achieving a rank-one recognition rate of 97.8 percent for an identification scenario and an equal error rate of 1.2 percent for a verification scenario on a database of 415 subjects and 1,386 total probes.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tpami.2007.1067

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. 10.1109/34.121791 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/0734-189X(86)90220-3 · DOI
  3. Bhanu, Human Ear Recognition in 3D, 91
  4. 10.1109/ICPR.2000.906202 · DOI
  5. 10.1109/TPAMI.2003.1227990 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1109/icpr.2004.1334594 · DOI
  7. 10.1109/ACVMOT.2005.38 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/0262-8856(92)90066-C · DOI
  9. 10.5565/rev/elcvia.108 · DOI
  10. 10.1007/11789239_7 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/1049-9660(91)90028-N · DOI
  12. 10.1016/s0262-8856(02)00128-2 · DOI
  13. 10.1109/CVPR.1988.196246 · DOI
  14. 10.1109/34.1000242 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/S0262-8856(02)00003-3 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/j.cviu.2004.11.001 · DOI
  17. Iannarelli, 1989, Ear Identification
  18. 10.1007/BF00133570 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/0262-8856(92)90076-F · DOI
  20. Messer, 1999, XM2VTSDB: The Extended M2VTS Database, Audio and Video-Based Biometric Person Authentication, 72
  21. 10.1109/CCST.1999.797956 · DOI
  22. 10.1109/IM.1999.805346 · DOI
  23. 10.1109/AFGR.2004.1301525 · DOI
  24. 10.1109/34.643895 · DOI
  25. 10.1109/ICPR.2002.1044746 · DOI
  26. 10.1109/CVPR.2005.447 · DOI
  27. 10.1109/CVPR.2005.450 · DOI
  28. 10.1109/CEC.2002.1006240 · DOI
  29. 10.1007/BF01427149 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Yan, P., & Bowyer, K. W.
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
Published
2007-08
Volume
29
Issue
8
Pages
1297-1308
ISSN
  • 0162-8828
  • 2160-9292
Cited by
294
References
1

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review