Cited by 32Morphological variations and asymmetryForensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology StudiesBiometric Identification and Security

An investigation of matching symmetry in the human pinnae with possible implications for 3D ear recognition and sound localization

Open access
Claes, Peter, Reijniers, Jonas, Shriver, Mark D., Snyders, Jonatan, Suetens, Paul, Nielandt, Joachim, De Tré, Guy, Vandermeulen, Dirk·2015·Journal of Anatomy

Abstract

The human external ears, or pinnae, have an intriguing shape and, like most parts of the human external body, bilateral symmetry is observed between left and right. It is a well-known part of our auditory sensory system and mediates the spatial localization of incoming sounds in 3D from monaural cues due to its shape-specific filtering as well as binaural cues due to the paired bilateral locations of the left and right ears. Another less broadly appreciated aspect of the human pinna shape is its uniqueness from one individual to another, which is on the level of what is seen in fingerprints and facial features. This makes pinnae very useful in human identification, which is of great interest in biometrics and forensics. Anatomically, the type of symmetry observed is known as matching symmetry, with structures present as separate mirror copies on both sides of the body, and in this work we report the first such investigation of the human pinna in 3D. Within the framework of geometric morphometrics, we started by partitioning ear shape, represented in a spatially dense way, into patterns of symmetry and asymmetry, following a two-factor anova design. Matching symmetry was measured in all substructures of the pinna anatomy. However, substructures that 'stick out' such as the helix, tragus, and lobule also contained a fair degree of asymmetry. In contrast, substructures such as the conchae, antitragus, and antihelix expressed relatively stronger degrees of symmetric variation in relation to their levels of asymmetry. Insights gained from this study were injected into an accompanying identification setup exploiting matching symmetry where improved performance is demonstrated. Finally, possible implications of the results in the context of ear recognition as well as sound localization are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/joa.12252

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A spatially dense mesh of 7,150 quasi-landmarks was mapped onto each image and its reflection, resulting in homologous vertices and triangles across individuals.

    “A spatially dense mesh of 7,150 quasi-landmarks (QLs) was mapped onto each image and its reflection. As a result of this mapping, the vertices and triangles are homologous across individuals [80].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Whittaker R. H.), pp. 33-64. Nether- lands, The Hauge: Springer.
  2. Hamm J, Lee DD (2008) Grassman Discriminant Analysis: a Unify- ing View on Subspace-Based learning. In Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 376- 383. Helsinki: ACM.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Claes, P., Reijniers, J., Shriver, M. D., Snyders, J., Suetens, P., Nielandt, J., De Tré, G., & Vandermeulen, D.
Affiliations
  • Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven (BE)
  • University of Antwerp (BE)
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
  • Ghent University (BE)
  • Department of Telecommunications and Information Processing, Database, Document and Content Management Research Group Ghent University Ghent Belgium
Corresponding author
Claes, Peter
Venue
Journal of Anatomy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-11-09
Volume
226
Issue
1
Pages
60-72
ISSN
  • 0021-8782 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7580
OpenAlex
W2060895903
Cited by
32
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1
FWCI
2.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Anatomy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Science and Technology in Flanders
  • Research Program of the Fund for Scientific Research - Flanders (Belgium)
  • Research Fund KU Leuven
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Morphological variations and asymmetry
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Biometric Identification and Security
Keywords
ear shape, bilateral symmetry, ear asymmetry, sound localization, geometric morphometrics, ear recognition, biometrics, helix, tragus, antihelix
MeSH terms
Analysis of Variance, Anthropometry, Humans, Sound Localization, Ear Auricle, Biometric Identification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review