The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Facial Action Unit Recognition by Exploiting Their Dynamic and Semantic Relationships
Abstract
A system that could automatically analyze the facial actions in real time has applications in a wide range of different fields. However, developing such a system is always challenging due to the richness, ambiguity, and the dynamic nature of facial actions. Although a number of research groups attempt to recognize facial action units (AUs) by either improving facial feature extraction techniques, or the AU classification techniques, these methods often recognize AUs or certain AU combinations individually and statically, ignoring the semantic relationships among AUs and the dynamics of AUs. Hence, these approaches cannot always recognize AUs reliably, robustly, and consistently. In this paper, we propose a novel approach that systematically accounts for the relationships among AUs and their temporal evolutions for AU recognition. Specifically, we use a dynamic Bayesian network (DBN) to model the relationships among different AUs. The DBN provides a coherent and unified hierarchical probabilistic framework to represent probabilistic relationships among various AUs and to account for the temporal changes in facial action development. Within our system, robust computer vision techniques are used to obtain AU measurements. And such AU measurements are then applied as evidence to the DBN for inferring various AUs. The experiments show that the integration of AU relationships and AU dynamics with AU measurements yields significant improvement of AU recognition, especially for spontaneous facial expressions and under more realistic environment including illumination variation, face pose variation, and occlusion.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (2019) · PsycTESTS Dataset · doi:10.1037/t27734-000 · Cited by 6,019
Recognizing action units for facial expression analysis
Tian, Y.-I., Kanade, T., & Cohn, J. F. (2001) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/34.908962 · Cited by 1,745
Cited by
Lucey, P., Cohn, J. F., Kanade, T., Saragih, J., Ambadar, Z., & Matthews, I. (2010) · 2010 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition - Workshops · doi:10.1109/cvprw.2010.5543262 · Cited by 4,303
A Survey of Affect Recognition Methods: Audio, Visual, and Spontaneous Expressions
Zeng, Z., Pantic, M., Roisman, G. I., & Huang, T. S. (2009) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2008.52 · Cited by 2,797
Social signal processing: Survey of an emerging domain
Vinciarelli, A., Pantic, M., & Bourlard, H. (2009) · Image and Vision Computing · doi:10.1016/j.imavis.2008.11.007 · Cited by 842
Detecting depression from facial actions and vocal prosody
Cohn, J. F., Kruez, T. S., Matthews, I., Yang, Y., Nguyen, M. H., Padilla, M. T., Zhou, F., & De la Torre, F. (2009) · 2009 3rd International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction and Workshops · doi:10.1109/acii.2009.5349358 · Cited by 494
A high-resolution 3D dynamic facial expression database
Yin, L., Chen, X., Sun, Y., Worm, T., & Reale, M. (2008) · 2008 8th IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face & Gesture Recognition · doi:10.1109/afgr.2008.4813324 · Cited by 488
Metadata
- Authors
- Tong, Y., Liao, W., & Ji, Q.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
- Published
- 2007-10
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1683-1699
- ISSN
- 0162-8828 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2108445559
- Cited by
- 378
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 32.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Facial Action Unit Recognition by Exploiting Their Dynamic and Semantic Relationships. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tpami.2007.1094
- The paper
- Tong, Y., Liao, W., & Ji, Q. (2007). Facial Action Unit Recognition by Exploiting Their Dynamic and Semantic Relationships. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1109/tpami.2007.1094
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.