Cited by 494Emotion and Mood RecognitionFace recognition and analysisFace Recognition and Perception

Detecting depression from facial actions and vocal prosody

Cohn, Jeffrey F., Kruez, Tomas Simon, Matthews, Iain, Yang, Ying, Nguyen, Minh Hoai, Padilla, Margara Tejera, Zhou, Feng, De la Torre, Fernando·2009·2009 3rd International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction and Workshops

Abstract

Current methods of assessing psychopathology depend almost entirely on verbal report (clinical interview or questionnaire) of patients, their family, or caregivers. They lack systematic and efficient ways of incorporating behavioral observations that are strong indicators of psychological disorder, much of which may occur outside the awareness of either individual. We compared clinical diagnosis of major depression with automatically measured facial actions and vocal prosody in patients undergoing treatment for depression. Manual FACS coding, active appearance modeling (AAM) and pitch extraction were used to measure facial and vocal expression. Classifiers using leave-one-out validation were SVM for FACS and for AAM and logistic regression for voice. Both face and voice demonstrated moderate concurrent validity with depression. Accuracy in detecting depression was 88% for manual FACS and 79% for AAM. Accuracy for vocal prosody was 79%. These findings suggest the feasibility of automatic detection of depression, raise new issues in automated facial image analysis and machine learning, and have exciting implications for clinical theory and practice.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/acii.2009.5349358

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cohn, J. F., Kruez, T. S., Matthews, I., Yang, Y., Nguyen, M. H., Padilla, M. T., Zhou, F., & De la Torre, F.
Affiliations
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • Carnegie Mellon University (US)
  • Walt Disney (United States) (US)
Venue
2009 3rd International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction and Workshops
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2009-09
Pages
1-7
ISSN
2156-8103 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2163928333
Cited by
494
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 45 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 52 · 2019: 43 · 2018: 45 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 11
FWCI
13.28
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction and workshops (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face recognition and analysis
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
Keywords
depression detection, facial action coding system, vocal prosody, facial expressions, voice pitch, active appearance models, major depressive disorder, concurrent validity, machine learning classification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review