The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Local-Learning-Based Feature Selection for High-Dimensional Data Analysis
Open accessAbstract
This paper considers feature selection for data classification in the presence of a huge number of irrelevant features. We propose a new feature-selection algorithm that addresses several major issues with prior work, including problems with algorithm implementation, computational complexity, and solution accuracy. The key idea is to decompose an arbitrarily complex nonlinear problem into a set of locally linear ones through local learning, and then learn feature relevance globally within the large margin framework. The proposed algorithm is based on well-established machine learning and numerical analysis techniques, without making any assumptions about the underlying data distribution. It is capable of processing many thousands of features within minutes on a personal computer while maintaining a very high accuracy that is nearly insensitive to a growing number of irrelevant features. Theoretical analyses of the algorithm's sample complexity suggest that the algorithm has a logarithmical sample complexity with respect to the number of features. Experiments on 11 synthetic and real-world data sets demonstrate the viability of our formulation of the feature-selection problem for supervised learning and the effectiveness of our algorithm.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso
Tibshirani, R. (1996) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1996.tb02080.x · Cited by 51,482
Gene selection for cancer classification using support vector machines
Guyon, I., Weston, J., Barnhill, S., & Vapnik, V. (2002) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1012487302797 · Cited by 9,954
Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer
van 't Veer, L. J., Dai, H., van de Vijver, M. J., He, Y. D., Hart, A. A. M., Mao, M., Peterse, H. L., van der Kooy, K., Marton, M. J., Witteveen, A. T., et al. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/415530a · Cited by 9,536
A Probabilistic Theory of Pattern Recognition
Devroye, L., Györfi, L., & Lugosi, G. (1996) · Stochastic Modelling and Applied Probability · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-0711-5 · Cited by 3,274
Feature selection, L 1 vs. L 2 regularization, and rotational invariance
Ng, A. Y. (2004) · Twenty-first international conference on Machine learning - ICML '04 · doi:10.1145/1015330.1015435 · Cited by 1,572
Cited by
Relief-based feature selection: Introduction and review
Urbanowicz, R. J., Meeker, M., La Cava, W., Olson, R. S., & Moore, J. H. (2018) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2018.07.014 · Cited by 1,311
Novel Speech Signal Processing Algorithms for High-Accuracy Classification of Parkinson’s Disease
Tsanas, A., Little, M. A., McSharry, P. E., Spielman, J., & Ramig, L. O. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.2012.2183367 · Cited by 732
Recent advances in feature selection and its applications
Li, Y., Li, T., & Liu, H. (2017) · Knowledge and Information Systems · doi:10.1007/s10115-017-1059-8 · Cited by 400
Document clustering: TF-IDF approach
Bafna, P., Pramod, D., & Vaidya, A. (2016) · 2016 International Conference on Electrical, Electronics, and Optimization Techniques (ICEEOT) · doi:10.1109/iceeot.2016.7754750 · Cited by 290
Vivekanandan, T., & Sriman Narayana Iyengar, N. C. (2017) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2017.09.011 · Cited by 185
Metadata
- Authors
- Sun, Y., Todorovic, S., & Goodison, S.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
- Published
- 2010-09
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1610-1626
- ISSN
- 0162-8828 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2148830179
- Cited by
- 347
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 16.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.