Cited by 1,405Advanced Vision and ImagingAdvanced Image and Video Retrieval TechniquesRobotics and Sensor-Based Localization

DAISY: An Efficient Dense Descriptor Applied to Wide-Baseline Stereo

Open access
Tola, E., Lepetit, V., Fua, P.·2010·IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence

Abstract

In this paper, we introduce a local image descriptor, DAISY, which is very efficient to compute densely. We also present an EM-based algorithm to compute dense depth and occlusion maps from wide-baseline image pairs using this descriptor. This yields much better results in wide-baseline situations than the pixel and correlation-based algorithms that are commonly used in narrow-baseline stereo. Also, using a descriptor makes our algorithm robust against many photometric and geometric transformations. Our descriptor is inspired from earlier ones such as SIFT and GLOH but can be computed much faster for our purposes. Unlike SURF, which can also be computed efficiently at every pixel, it does not introduce artifacts that degrade the matching performance when used densely. It is important to note that our approach is the first algorithm that attempts to estimate dense depth maps from wide-baseline image pairs, and we show that it is a good one at that with many experiments for depth estimation accuracy, occlusion detection, and comparing it against other descriptors on laser-scanned ground truth scenes. We also tested our approach on a variety of indoor and outdoor scenes with different photometric and geometric transformations and our experiments support our claim to being robust against these.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tpami.2009.77

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • LIOP and DAISY are highly effective in recognition and classification due to their robustness to numerous variations and distortions.

    “Meanwhile, local intensity order pattern (LIOP)36 and DAISY37 have been demonstrated as highly effective methods applied in the recognition and classification task due to their robustness to numerous variations and distortions.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tola, E., Lepetit, V., & Fua, P.
Affiliations
École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
Published
2010-05
Volume
32
Issue
5
Pages
815-830
ISSN
0162-8828 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2104853049
Cited by
1,405
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 64 · 2023: 61 · 2022: 72 · 2021: 84 · 2020: 102 · 2019: 117 · 2018: 100 · 2017: 126 · 2016: 139 · 2015: 136 · 2014: 120 · 2013: 93 · 2012: 55
FWCI
49.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Vision and Imaging
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization
Keywords
DAISY descriptor, dense matching, wide-baseline stereo, dense depth estimation, occlusion detection, expectation-maximization algorithm, local image descriptors
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Artificial Intelligence, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Pattern Recognition, Automated, Photogrammetry, Subtraction Technique, Imaging, Three-Dimensional

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review