The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Segmentation, Inference and Classification of Partially Overlapping Nanoparticles
Abstract
This paper presents a method that enables automated morphology analysis of partially overlapping nanoparticles in electron micrographs. In the undertaking of morphology analysis, three tasks appear necessary: separate individual particles from an agglomerate of overlapping nano-objects; infer the particle's missing contours; and ultimately, classify the particles by shape based on their complete contours. Our specific method adopts a two-stage approach: the first stage executes the task of particle separation, and the second stage conducts simultaneously the tasks of contour inference and shape classification. For the first stage, a modified ultimate erosion process is developed for decomposing a mixture of particles into markers, and then, an edge-to-marker association method is proposed to identify the set of evidences that eventually delineate individual objects. We also provided theoretical justification regarding the separation capability of the first stage. In the second stage, the set of evidences become inputs to a Gaussian mixture model on B-splines, the solution of which leads to the joint learning of the missing contour and the particle shape. Using twelve real electron micrographs of overlapping nanoparticles, we compare the proposed method with seven state-of-the-art methods. The results show the superiority of the proposed method in terms of particle recognition rate.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Computational Approach to Edge Detection
Canny, J. (1986) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.1986.4767851 · Cited by 30,004
Cited by
An Automatic Learning-Based Framework for Robust Nucleus Segmentation
Xing, F., Xie, Y., & Yang, L. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2015.2481436 · Cited by 351
Song, Y., Zhang, L., Chen, S., Ni, D., Lei, B., & Wang, T. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.2015.2430895 · Cited by 273
Classification of lung sounds using convolutional neural networks
Aykanat, M., Kılıç, Ö., Kurt, B., & Saryal, S. (2017) · EURASIP Journal on Image and Video Processing · doi:10.1186/s13640-017-0213-2 · Cited by 256
High-throughput histopathological image analysis via robust cell segmentation and hashing
Zhang, X., Xing, F., Su, H., Yang, L., & Zhang, S. (2015) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2015.10.005 · Cited by 87
Periyasamy, A. P. (2023) · Toxics · doi:10.3390/toxics11070575 · Cited by 50
Metadata
- Authors
- Park, C., Huang, J. Z., Ji, J. X., & Ding, Y.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
- Published
- 2013-03
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1-1
- ISSN
- 0162-8828 (ISSN-L)
- 2160-9292
- OpenAlex
- W2109517492
- Cited by
- 172
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Segmentation, Inference and Classification of Partially Overlapping Nanoparticles. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tpami.2012.163
- The paper
- Park, C., Huang, J. Z., Ji, J. X., & Ding, Y. (2013). Segmentation, Inference and Classification of Partially Overlapping Nanoparticles. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1109/tpami.2012.163
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.