The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Lift: Multi-Label Learning with Label-Specific Features
Abstract
Multi-label learning deals with the problem where each example is represented by a single instance (feature vector) while associated with a set of class labels. Existing approaches learn from multi-label data by manipulating with identical feature set, i.e. the very instance representation of each example is employed in the discrimination processes of all class labels. However, this popular strategy might be suboptimal as each label is supposed to possess specific characteristics of its own. In this paper, another strategy to learn from multi-label data is studied, where label-specific features are exploited to benefit the discrimination of different class labels. Accordingly, an intuitive yet effective algorithm named LIFT, i.e. multi-label learning with Label specific Features, is proposed. LIFT firstly constructs features specific to each label by conducting clustering analysis on its positive and negative instances, and then performs training and testing by querying the clustering results. Comprehensive experiments on a total of 17 benchmark data sets clearly validate the superiority of LIFT against other well-established multi-label learning algorithms as well as the effectiveness of label-specific features.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines
Chang, C.-C., & Lin, C.-J. (2011) · ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology · doi:10.1145/1961189.1961199 · Cited by 40,918
The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.
Hanley, J. A., & McNeil, B. J. (1982) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiology.143.1.7063747 · Cited by 21,856
The WEKA data mining software: an update
Hall, M., Frank, E., Holmes, G., Pfahringer, B., Reutemann, P., & Witten, I. H. (2009) · ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter · doi:10.1145/1656274.1656278 · Cited by 17,750
Individual Comparisons by Ranking Methods
Wilcoxon, F. (1945) · Biometrics Bulletin · doi:10.2307/3001968 · Cited by 15,354
Jain, A. K., Murty, M. N., & Flynn, P. J. (1999) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/331499.331504 · Cited by 13,199
Multiple comparisons among means
Dunn, O. J. (1961) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1961.10482090 · Cited by 5,006
A Comparative Study on Feature Selection in Text Categorization
Yang, Y., & Pedersen, J. (1997) · Cited by 4,790
ML-KNN: A lazy learning approach to multi-label learning
Zhang, M.-L., & Zhou, Z.-H. (2007) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2006.12.019 · Cited by 3,552
Self-citationA Review on Multi-Label Learning Algorithms
Zhang, M.-L., & Zhou, Z.-H. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering · doi:10.1109/tkde.2013.39 · Cited by 3,321
Self-citationLearning multi-label scene classification
Boutell, M. R., Luo, J., Shen, X., & Brown, C. M. (2004) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/j.patcog.2004.03.009 · Cited by 2,296
Cited by
Distributed selection of continuous features in multilabel classification using mutual information
Gonzalez-Lopez, J., Ventura, S., & Cano, A. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2019.2944298 · Cited by 60
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, M.-L., & Wu, L.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
- Published
- 2015-01-01
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 107-120
- ISSN
- 0162-8828 (ISSN-L)
- 2160-9292
- 1939-3539
- OpenAlex
- W2090630554
- Cited by
- 536
- References
- 48
- FWCI
- 24.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Lift: Multi-Label Learning with Label-Specific Features. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tpami.2014.2339815
- The paper
- Zhang, M.-L., & Wu, L. (2015). Lift: Multi-Label Learning with Label-Specific Features. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1109/tpami.2014.2339815
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.