The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Query Specific Rank Fusion for Image Retrieval
Abstract
Recently two lines of image retrieval algorithms demonstrate excellent scalability: 1) local features indexed by a vocabulary tree, and 2) holistic features indexed by compact hashing codes. Although both of them are able to search visually similar images effectively, their retrieval precision may vary dramatically among queries. Therefore, combining these two types of methods is expected to further enhance the retrieval precision. However, the feature characteristics and the algorithmic procedures of these methods are dramatically different, which is very challenging for the feature-level fusion. This motivates us to investigate how to fuse the ordered retrieval sets, i.e., the ranks of images, given by multiple retrieval methods, to boost the retrieval precision without sacrificing their scalability. In this paper, we model retrieval ranks as graphs of candidate images and propose a graph-based query specific fusion approach, where multiple graphs are merged and reranked by conducting a link analysis on a fused graph. The retrieval quality of an individual method is measured on-the-fly by assessing the consistency of the top candidates' nearest neighborhoods. Hence, it is capable of adaptively integrating the strengths of the retrieval methods using local or holistic features for different query images. This proposed method does not need any supervision, has few parameters, and is easy to implement. Extensive and thorough experiments have been conducted on four public datasets, i.e., the UKbench, Corel-5K, Holidays and the large-scale San Francisco Landmarks datasets. Our proposed method has achieved very competitive performance, including state-of-the-art results on several data sets, e.g., the N-S score 3.83 for UKbench.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2017) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3065386 · Cited by 112,155
ImageNet: A large-scale hierarchical image database
Deng, J., Dong, W., Socher, R., Li, L.-J., Li, K., & Fei-Fei, L. (2009) · 2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2009.5206848 · Cited by 65,333
Distinctive Image Features from Scale-Invariant Keypoints
Lowe, D. G. (2004) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1023/b:visi.0000029664.99615.94 · Cited by 55,589
Video Google: a text retrieval approach to object matching in videos
Sivic, & Zisserman (2003) · Proceedings Ninth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision · doi:10.1109/iccv.2003.1238663 · Cited by 6,367
Product Quantization for Nearest Neighbor Search
Jégou, H., Douze, M., & Schmid, C. (2011) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2010.57 · Cited by 2,956 · cited 1×
“Besides vocabulary trees, product quantization [15] and its variants [9], [26]”
BackgroundHamming Embedding and Weak Geometric Consistency for Large Scale Image Search
Jegou, H., Douze, M., & Schmid, C. (2008) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-88682-2_24 · Cited by 1,901
Near-Optimal Hashing Algorithms for Approximate Nearest Neighbor in High Dimensions
Andoni, A., & Indyk, P. (2006) · 2006 47th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS'06) · doi:10.1109/focs.2006.49 · Cited by 1,067
Small codes and large image databases for recognition
Torralba, A., Fergus, R., & Weiss, Y. (2008) · 2008 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2008.4587633 · Cited by 727
Cited by
(2021) · doi:10.1145/3448016.3457550 · Cited by 416
Scalable Person Re-identification on Supervised Smoothed Manifold
Bai, S., Bai, X., & Tian, Q. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.358 · Cited by 320
Optimization Methods for Personalizing Large Language Models through Retrieval Augmentation
Salemi, A., Kallumadi, S., & Zamani, H. (2024) · Proceedings of the 47th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval · doi:10.1145/3626772.3657783 · Cited by 52
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, S., Yang, M., Cour, T., Yu, K., & Metaxas, D. N.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
- Published
- 2015-04-01
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 803-815
- ISSN
- 0162-8828 (ISSN-L)
- 2160-9292
- OpenAlex
- W2135364649
- Cited by
- 167
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 22.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Query Specific Rank Fusion for Image Retrieval. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tpami.2014.2346201
- The paper
- Zhang, S., Yang, M., Cour, T., Yu, K., & Metaxas, D. N. (2015). Query Specific Rank Fusion for Image Retrieval. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1109/tpami.2014.2346201
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.