The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
HPatches: A benchmark and evaluation of handcrafted and learned local descriptors
Open accessAbstract
In this paper, a novel benchmark is introduced for evaluating local image descriptors. We demonstrate limitations of the commonly used datasets and evaluation protocols, that lead to ambiguities and contradictory results in the literature. Furthermore, these benchmarks are nearly saturated due to the recent improvements in local descriptors obtained by learning from large annotated datasets. To address these issues, we introduce a new large dataset suitable for training and testing modern descriptors, together with strictly defined evaluation protocols in several tasks such as matching, retrieval and verification. This allows for more realistic, thus more reliable comparisons in different application scenarios. We evaluate the performance of several state-of-the-art descriptors and analyse their properties. We show that a simple normalisation of traditional hand-crafted descriptors is able to boost their performance to the level of deep learning based descriptors once realistic benchmarks are considered. Additionally we specify a protocol for learning and evaluating using cross validation. We show that when training state-of-the-art descriptors on this dataset, the traditional verification task is almost entirely saturated.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
For evaluation, a benchmark dataset was designed for unstructured and planetary scenes inspired by the HPatches dataset.
“For the evaluation of the proposed architecture and the comparison with other widely used handcrafted algorithms, a benchmark dataset was designed for unstructured and planetary scenes inspired by HPatches dataset [44], one of the most popular evaluation datasets for keypoint detection and description in general-purpose images.”
From Keypoint Detection and Description through Deep Learning in Unstructured Environments (2023) · cites this paper as [44]
The Benchmark design section (p. 3) identifies HPatches as a benchmark for evaluating local image descriptors, supporting the citation’s identification of the dataset that inspired the citing authors’ benchmark. The Introduction (p. 2) says detector evaluation is a future possibility, not an existing focus; our copy also does not establish that HPatches is among the most popular evaluation datasets. The planetary benchmark is the citing authors’ work, not a result attributed to HPatches. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Histograms of Oriented Gradients for Human Detection
Dalal, N., & Triggs, B. (2005) · 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2005.177 · Cited by 33,584
SURF: Speeded Up Robust Features
Bay, H., Tuytelaars, T., & Van Gool, L. (2006) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/11744023_32 · Cited by 14,955
Self-citationA performance evaluation of local descriptors
Mikolajczyk, K., & Schmid, C. (2005) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2005.188 · Cited by 6,723
Self-citationMachine Learning for High-Speed Corner Detection
Rosten, E., & Drummond, T. (2006) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/11744023_34 · Cited by 4,555
PCA-SIFT: a more distinctive representation for local image descriptors
Ke, Y., & Sukthankar, R. (2004) · Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2004. CVPR 2004. · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2004.1315206 · Cited by 3,237
A comparison of affine region detectors
Mikolajczyk, K., Tuytelaars, T., Schmid, C., Zisserman, A., Matas, J., Schaffalitzky, F., Kadir, T., & Gool, L. V. (2005) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-005-3848-x · Cited by 2,939
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 89
- 10.1109/CVPR.2017.523 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-319-49409-8_11 · DOI
- 10.1109/CVPR.2014.9 · DOI
- 10.1109/ICPR.2006.1153 · DOI
- 10.1109/ICRA.2013.6630639 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11263-009-0229-x · DOI
- 10.1109/CVPRW.2018.00060 · DOI
- 10.1109/CVPR.2015.7299165 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-319-46466-4_28 · DOI
- 10.5244/C.30.49 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-642-15552-9_14 · DOI
- 10.1109/TPAMI.2008.275 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-642-03798-6_16 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-642-33783-3_16 · DOI
- 10.1109/CVPR.2013.373 · DOI
- 10.1109/ICCV.2011.6126263 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.imavis.2004.02.006 · DOI
- 10.5244/C.31.184 · DOI
- 10.1145/2671188.2749379 · DOI
- 10.1109/CVPR.2005.235 · DOI
- 10.1109/CVPR.2011.5995385 · DOI
- 10.1109/CVPR.2009.5206733 · DOI
- 10.1109/TPAMI.2014.2343961 · DOI
- 10.1109/TIP.2014.2330794 · DOI
- 10.1109/TIP.2014.2324824 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-642-33718-5_17 · DOI
- 10.1109/CVPR.2012.6247715 · DOI
- 10.1109/CVPR.2016.19 · DOI
- ziegler, 2012, Locally uniform comparison image descriptor, Proc Advances Neural Inf Process Syst, 1
- 10.1007/978-3-030-01240-3_18 · DOI
- 10.1109/TPAMI.2014.2343961 · DOI
- miksik, 2012, Evaluation of local detectors and descriptors for fast feature matching, Proc Int Conf Pattern Recognit, 2681
- 10.1109/CVPR.2009.5206839 · DOI
- 10.1109/CVPR.2016.42 · DOI
- wang, 2011, Local intensity order pattern for feature description, Proc IEEE Int Conf Comput Vis, 603
- 10.1109/ICCV.2011.6126542 · DOI
- 10.1109/CVPR.2015.7299145 · DOI
- calonder, 2010, BRIEF: Binary robust independent elementary features, Proc Eur Conf Comput Vis, 778
- 10.1109/ICPR.1994.576366 · DOI
- 10.1109/34.93808 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00318371 · DOI
- 10.1007/BFb0015574 · DOI
- 10.1109/TPAMI.2011.235 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/978-3-319-10584-0_26 · DOI
- donahue, 2014, Decaf: A deep convolutional activation feature for generic visual recognition, Proc Int Conf Mach Learn, 647
- dosovitskiy, 2014, Discriminative unsupervised feature learning with convolutional neural networks, Adv Neural Inf Process Syst, 766
- 10.1109/CVPR.2015.7299064 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/ICCV.2015.22 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11263-016-0924-3 · DOI
- han, 2015, Matchnet: Unifying feature and metric learning for patch-based matching, Proc IEEE Conf Comput Vis Pattern Recognit, 3279
- 10.5244/C.30.119 · DOI
- 10.1109/ICPR.2016.7899992 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11263-011-0430-6 · DOI
- 10.1109/CVPR.2007.382971 · DOI
- 10.1109/CVPR.2016.133 · DOI
- 10.1109/TPAMI.2010.54 · DOI
- cai, 2011, Learning linear discriminant projections for dimensionality reduction of image descriptors, IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell, 33, 338, 10.1109/TPAMI.2010.89 · DOI
- 10.1109/TPAMI.2011.103 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/TPAMI.2014.2301163 · DOI
- 10.1109/CVPR.2012.6248018 · DOI
- jahrer, 2008, Learned local descriptors for recognition and matching, Proc Comput Vis Winter Workshop, 39
- 10.1109/ICCV.2007.4408871 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-642-42051-1_77 · DOI
- 10.1109/ICCV.1999.790410 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/CVPR.2008.4587635 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/CVPR.2007.383172 · DOI
- 10.5201/ipol.2011.my-asift · DOI
- 10.1109/IST.2012.6295482 · DOI
- 10.1109/CVPR.2007.383258 · DOI
- 10.1109/ICCV.2007.4408857 · DOI
- lewis, 1995, Fast template matching, Vision Interface, 95, 120
- bishop, 1995, Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition, 10.1093/oso/9780198538493.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/WACV.2016.7477723 · DOI
- 10.1109/ICCV.2011.6126544 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/CVPR.2015.7298850 · DOI
- 10.1109/CVPR.2017.410 · DOI
- 10.1561/0600000017 · DOI
- 10.5244/C.2.23 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/3-540-47969-4_9 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/CVPR.2017.649 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11263-013-0622-3 · DOI
- 10.1109/TIP.2014.2315959 · DOI
- 10.1109/DCC.2014.50 · DOI
- mishchuk, 2017, Working hard to know your neighbor's margins: Local descriptor learning loss, Proc 31st Int Conf Neural Inf Process Syst, 4826
- 10.1109/SDE.2011.5952056 · DOI
- 10.1109/ICCV.2015.19 · DOI
- 10.1145/1143844.1143874 · DOI · Paper page
- fawcett, 2004, Roc graphs: Notes and practical considerations for researchers, Mach Learn, 31, 1
- 10.1007/s11263-011-0473-8 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Keypoint Detection and Description through Deep Learning in Unstructured Environments
Petrakis, G., & Partsinevelos, P. (2023) · Robotics · doi:10.3390/robotics12050137 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Balntas, V., Lenc, K., Vedaldi, A., Tuytelaars, T., Matas, J., & Mikolajczyk, K.
- Affiliations
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Imperial College London (GB)
- Czech Technical University in Prague (CZ)
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
- Published
- 2019
- Pages
- 1-1
- ISSN
- 1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
- 0162-8828
- 2160-9292
- 1939-3539
- OpenAlex
- W2608303904
- Cited by
- 132
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 12
- FWCI
- 2.96
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
- IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- Lirias (KU Leuven) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/M013774/1, EP/N007743/1)
- H2020 European Research Council (638009-IDIU)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Keywords
- local image descriptors, descriptor matching, image retrieval, verification
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review