Cited by 132Advanced Image and Video Retrieval TechniquesImage Retrieval and Classification TechniquesAdvanced Neural Network Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

HPatches: A benchmark and evaluation of handcrafted and learned local descriptors

Open access
Balntas, Vassileios, Lenc, Karel, Vedaldi, Andrea, Tuytelaars, Tinne, Matas, Jiri, Mikolajczyk, Krystian·2019·IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence

Abstract

In this paper, a novel benchmark is introduced for evaluating local image descriptors. We demonstrate limitations of the commonly used datasets and evaluation protocols, that lead to ambiguities and contradictory results in the literature. Furthermore, these benchmarks are nearly saturated due to the recent improvements in local descriptors obtained by learning from large annotated datasets. To address these issues, we introduce a new large dataset suitable for training and testing modern descriptors, together with strictly defined evaluation protocols in several tasks such as matching, retrieval and verification. This allows for more realistic, thus more reliable comparisons in different application scenarios. We evaluate the performance of several state-of-the-art descriptors and analyse their properties. We show that a simple normalisation of traditional hand-crafted descriptors is able to boost their performance to the level of deep learning based descriptors once realistic benchmarks are considered. Additionally we specify a protocol for learning and evaluating using cross validation. We show that when training state-of-the-art descriptors on this dataset, the traditional verification task is almost entirely saturated.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tpami.2019.2915233

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For evaluation, a benchmark dataset was designed for unstructured and planetary scenes inspired by the HPatches dataset.

    “For the evaluation of the proposed architecture and the comparison with other widely used handcrafted algorithms, a benchmark dataset was designed for unstructured and planetary scenes inspired by HPatches dataset [44], one of the most popular evaluation datasets for keypoint detection and description in general-purpose images.”

    From Keypoint Detection and Description through Deep Learning in Unstructured Environments (2023) · cites this paper as [44]

    The Benchmark design section (p. 3) identifies HPatches as a benchmark for evaluating local image descriptors, supporting the citation’s identification of the dataset that inspired the citing authors’ benchmark. The Introduction (p. 2) says detector evaluation is a future possibility, not an existing focus; our copy also does not establish that HPatches is among the most popular evaluation datasets. The planetary benchmark is the citing authors’ work, not a result attributed to HPatches. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 89

  1. 10.1109/CVPR.2017.523 · DOI
  2. 10.1007/978-3-319-49409-8_11 · DOI
  3. 10.1109/CVPR.2014.9 · DOI
  4. 10.1109/ICPR.2006.1153 · DOI
  5. 10.1109/ICRA.2013.6630639 · DOI
  6. 10.1007/s11263-009-0229-x · DOI
  7. 10.1109/CVPRW.2018.00060 · DOI
  8. 10.1109/CVPR.2015.7299165 · DOI
  9. 10.1007/978-3-319-46466-4_28 · DOI
  10. 10.5244/C.30.49 · DOI
  11. 10.1007/978-3-642-15552-9_14 · DOI
  12. 10.1109/TPAMI.2008.275 · DOI
  13. 10.1007/978-3-642-03798-6_16 · DOI
  14. 10.1007/978-3-642-33783-3_16 · DOI
  15. 10.1109/CVPR.2013.373 · DOI
  16. 10.1109/ICCV.2011.6126263 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/j.imavis.2004.02.006 · DOI
  18. 10.5244/C.31.184 · DOI
  19. 10.1145/2671188.2749379 · DOI
  20. 10.1109/CVPR.2005.235 · DOI
  21. 10.1109/CVPR.2011.5995385 · DOI
  22. 10.1109/CVPR.2009.5206733 · DOI
  23. 10.1109/TPAMI.2014.2343961 · DOI
  24. 10.1109/TIP.2014.2330794 · DOI
  25. 10.1109/TIP.2014.2324824 · DOI
  26. 10.1007/978-3-642-33718-5_17 · DOI
  27. 10.1109/CVPR.2012.6247715 · DOI
  28. 10.1109/CVPR.2016.19 · DOI
  29. ziegler, 2012, Locally uniform comparison image descriptor, Proc Advances Neural Inf Process Syst, 1
  30. 10.1007/978-3-030-01240-3_18 · DOI
  31. 10.1109/TPAMI.2014.2343961 · DOI
  32. miksik, 2012, Evaluation of local detectors and descriptors for fast feature matching, Proc Int Conf Pattern Recognit, 2681
  33. 10.1109/CVPR.2009.5206839 · DOI
  34. 10.1109/CVPR.2016.42 · DOI
  35. wang, 2011, Local intensity order pattern for feature description, Proc IEEE Int Conf Comput Vis, 603
  36. 10.1109/ICCV.2011.6126542 · DOI
  37. 10.1109/CVPR.2015.7299145 · DOI
  38. calonder, 2010, BRIEF: Binary robust independent elementary features, Proc Eur Conf Comput Vis, 778
  39. 10.1109/ICPR.1994.576366 · DOI
  40. 10.1109/34.93808 · DOI
  41. 10.1007/BF00318371 · DOI
  42. 10.1007/BFb0015574 · DOI
  43. 10.1109/TPAMI.2011.235 · DOI · Paper page
  44. 10.1007/978-3-319-10584-0_26 · DOI
  45. donahue, 2014, Decaf: A deep convolutional activation feature for generic visual recognition, Proc Int Conf Mach Learn, 647
  46. dosovitskiy, 2014, Discriminative unsupervised feature learning with convolutional neural networks, Adv Neural Inf Process Syst, 766
  47. 10.1109/CVPR.2015.7299064 · DOI · Paper page
  48. 10.1109/ICCV.2015.22 · DOI
  49. 10.1007/s11263-016-0924-3 · DOI
  50. han, 2015, Matchnet: Unifying feature and metric learning for patch-based matching, Proc IEEE Conf Comput Vis Pattern Recognit, 3279
  51. 10.5244/C.30.119 · DOI
  52. 10.1109/ICPR.2016.7899992 · DOI
  53. 10.1007/s11263-011-0430-6 · DOI
  54. 10.1109/CVPR.2007.382971 · DOI
  55. 10.1109/CVPR.2016.133 · DOI
  56. 10.1109/TPAMI.2010.54 · DOI
  57. cai, 2011, Learning linear discriminant projections for dimensionality reduction of image descriptors, IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell, 33, 338, 10.1109/TPAMI.2010.89 · DOI
  58. 10.1109/TPAMI.2011.103 · DOI · Paper page
  59. 10.1109/TPAMI.2014.2301163 · DOI
  60. 10.1109/CVPR.2012.6248018 · DOI
  61. jahrer, 2008, Learned local descriptors for recognition and matching, Proc Comput Vis Winter Workshop, 39
  62. 10.1109/ICCV.2007.4408871 · DOI
  63. 10.1007/978-3-642-42051-1_77 · DOI
  64. 10.1109/ICCV.1999.790410 · DOI · Paper page
  65. 10.1109/CVPR.2008.4587635 · DOI · Paper page
  66. 10.1109/CVPR.2007.383172 · DOI
  67. 10.5201/ipol.2011.my-asift · DOI
  68. 10.1109/IST.2012.6295482 · DOI
  69. 10.1109/CVPR.2007.383258 · DOI
  70. 10.1109/ICCV.2007.4408857 · DOI
  71. lewis, 1995, Fast template matching, Vision Interface, 95, 120
  72. bishop, 1995, Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition, 10.1093/oso/9780198538493.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
  73. 10.1109/WACV.2016.7477723 · DOI
  74. 10.1109/ICCV.2011.6126544 · DOI · Paper page
  75. 10.1109/CVPR.2015.7298850 · DOI
  76. 10.1109/CVPR.2017.410 · DOI
  77. 10.1561/0600000017 · DOI
  78. 10.5244/C.2.23 · DOI · Paper page
  79. 10.1007/3-540-47969-4_9 · DOI · Paper page
  80. 10.1109/CVPR.2017.649 · DOI
  81. 10.1007/s11263-013-0622-3 · DOI
  82. 10.1109/TIP.2014.2315959 · DOI
  83. 10.1109/DCC.2014.50 · DOI
  84. mishchuk, 2017, Working hard to know your neighbor's margins: Local descriptor learning loss, Proc 31st Int Conf Neural Inf Process Syst, 4826
  85. 10.1109/SDE.2011.5952056 · DOI
  86. 10.1109/ICCV.2015.19 · DOI
  87. 10.1145/1143844.1143874 · DOI · Paper page
  88. fawcett, 2004, Roc graphs: Notes and practical considerations for researchers, Mach Learn, 31, 1
  89. 10.1007/s11263-011-0473-8 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Balntas, V., Lenc, K., Vedaldi, A., Tuytelaars, T., Matas, J., & Mikolajczyk, K.
Affiliations
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Imperial College London (GB)
  • Czech Technical University in Prague (CZ)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
Published
2019
Pages
1-1
ISSN
  • 1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
  • 0162-8828
  • 2160-9292
  • 1939-3539
OpenAlex
W2608303904
Cited by
132
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 12
FWCI
2.96
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
  • IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Lirias (KU Leuven) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/M013774/1, EP/N007743/1)
  • H2020 European Research Council (638009-IDIU)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
Keywords
local image descriptors, descriptor matching, image retrieval, verification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review