Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 268

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

MHF-Net: An Interpretable Deep Network for Multispectral and Hyperspectral Image Fusion

Xie, Qi, Zhou, Minghao, Zhao, Qian, Xu, Zongben, Meng, Deyu·2022·IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence

Abstract

Multispectral and hyperspectral image fusion (MS/HS fusion) aims to fuse a high-resolution multispectral (HrMS) and a low-resolution hyperspectral (LrHS) images to generate a high-resolution hyperspectral (HrHS) image, which has become one of the most commonly addressed problems for hyperspectral image processing. In this paper, we specifically designed a network architecture for the MS/HS fusion task, called MHF-net, which not only contains clear interpretability, but also reasonably embeds the well studied linear mapping that links the HrHS image to HrMS and LrHS images. In particular, we first construct an MS/HS fusion model which merges the generalization models of low-resolution images and the low-rankness prior knowledge of HrHS image into a concise formulation, and then we build the proposed network by unfolding the proximal gradient algorithm for solving the proposed model. As a result of the careful design for the model and algorithm, all the fundamental modules in MHF-net have clear physical meanings and are thus easily interpretable. This not only greatly facilitates an easy intuitive observation and analysis on what happens inside the network, but also leads to its good generalization capability. Based on the architecture of MHF-net, we further design two deep learning regimes for two general cases in practice: consistent MHF-net and blind MHF-net. The former is suitable in the case that spectral and spatial responses of training and testing data are consistent, just as considered in most of the pervious general supervised MS/HS fusion researches. The latter ensures a good generalization in mismatch cases of spectral and spatial responses in training and testing data, and even across different sensors, which is generally considered to be a challenging issue for general supervised MS/HS fusion methods. Experimental results on simulated and real data substantiate the superiority of our method both visually and quantitatively as compared with state-of-the-art methods along this line of research.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tpami.2020.3015691

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 53 references

Cited by

See all 268

Metadata

Authors
Xie, Q., Zhou, M., Zhao, Q., Xu, Z., & Meng, D.
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
Published
2022-03-01
Volume
44
Issue
3
Pages
1457-1473
ISSN
  • 0162-8828 (ISSN-L)
  • 2160-9292
  • 1939-3539
OpenAlex
W3048794210
Cited by
268
References
53
FWCI
14.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: MHF-Net: An Interpretable Deep Network for Multispectral and Hyperspectral Image Fusion. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tpami.2020.3015691
The paper
Xie, Q., Zhou, M., Zhao, Q., Xu, Z., & Meng, D. (2022). MHF-Net: An Interpretable Deep Network for Multispectral and Hyperspectral Image Fusion. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1109/tpami.2020.3015691

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.