The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Image Quality Assessment: Unifying Structure and Texture Similarity
Open accessAbstract
Objective measures of image quality generally operate by comparing pixels of a "degraded" image to those of the original. Relative to human observers, these measures are overly sensitive to resampling of texture regions (e.g., replacing one patch of grass with another). Here, we develop the first full-reference image quality model with explicit tolerance to texture resampling. Using a convolutional neural network, we construct an injective and differentiable function that transforms images to multi-scale overcomplete representations. We demonstrate empirically that the spatial averages of the feature maps in this representation capture texture appearance, in that they provide a set of sufficient statistical constraints to synthesize a wide variety of texture patterns. We then describe an image quality method that combines correlations of these spatial averages ("texture similarity") with correlations of the feature maps ("structure similarity"). The parameters of the proposed measure are jointly optimized to match human ratings of image quality, while minimizing the reported distances between subimages cropped from the same texture images. Experiments show that the optimized method explains human perceptual scores, both on conventional image quality databases, as well as on texture databases. The measure also offers competitive performance on related tasks such as texture classification and retrieval. Finally, we show that our method is relatively insensitive to geometric transformations (e.g., translation and dilation), without use of any specialized training or data augmentation. Code is available at https://github.com/dingkeyan93/DISTS.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2017) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3065386 · Cited by 112,155
Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization
Kingma, D. P., & Ba, J. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.6980 · Cited by 98,946
ImageNet: A large-scale hierarchical image database
Deng, J., Dong, W., Socher, R., Li, L.-J., Li, K., & Fei-Fei, L. (2009) · 2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2009.5206848 · Cited by 65,333
Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity
Wang, Z., Bovik, A. C., Sheikh, H. R., & Simoncelli, E. P. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2003.819861 · Cited by 57,892
Self-citationDistinctive Image Features from Scale-Invariant Keypoints
Lowe, D. G. (2004) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1023/b:visi.0000029664.99615.94 · Cited by 55,589
Multiresolution gray-scale and rotation invariant texture classification with local binary patterns
Ojala, T., Pietikainen, M., & Maenpaa, T. (2002) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2002.1017623 · Cited by 15,398
The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metric
Zhang, R., Isola, P., Efros, A. A., Shechtman, E., & Wang, O. (2018) · 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2018.00068 · Cited by 14,623
Intriguing properties of neural networks
Szegedy, C., Zaremba, W., Sutskever, I., Bruna, J., Erhan, D., Goodfellow, I., & Fergus, R. (2013) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1312.6199 · Cited by 8,143
Multiscale structural similarity for image quality assessment
Wang, Z., Simoncelli, E. P., & Bovik, A. C. (2004) · The Thrity-Seventh Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems & Computers, 2003 · doi:10.1109/acssc.2003.1292216 · Cited by 6,253 · cited 15×
“Inspired by the form of SSIM [2], we define separate quality measurements for the texture (using the global means) and the structure (using the global correlation) of each pair of corresponding feature maps: where µ ˜ x j and ˜ y j , respectively.”
InfluentialSelf-citationMean squared error: Love it or leave it? A new look at Signal Fidelity Measures
Wang, Z., & Bovik, A. C. (2009) · IEEE Signal Processing Magazine · doi:10.1109/msp.2008.930649 · Cited by 3,175
Describing Textures in the Wild
Cimpoi, M., Maji, S., Kokkinos, I., Mohamed, S., & Vedaldi, A. (2014) · 2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2014.461 · Cited by 2,438
A Parametric Texture Model Based on Joint Statistics of Complex Wavelet Coefficients
Portilla, J., & Simoncelli, E. P. (2000) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1023/a:1026553619983 · Cited by 1,806
Self-citationImage database TID2013: Peculiarities, results and perspectives
Ponomarenko, N., Jin, L., Ieremeiev, O., Lukin, V., Egiazarian, K., Astola, J., Vozel, B., Chehdi, K., Carli, M., Battisti, F., et al. (2015) · Signal Processing: Image Communication · doi:10.1016/j.image.2014.10.009 · Cited by 1,241
The effects of a visual fidelity criterion of the encoding of images
Mannos, J., & Sakrison, D. (1974) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/tit.1974.1055250 · Cited by 1,063
Reciprocal rank fusion outperforms condorcet and individual rank learning methods
Cormack, G. V., Clarke, C. L. A., & Buettcher, S. (2009) · Proceedings of the 32nd international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval · doi:10.1145/1571941.1572114 · Cited by 797
KADID-10k: A Large-scale Artificially Distorted IQA Database
Lin, H., Hosu, V., & Saupe, D. (2019) · 2019 Eleventh International Conference on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX) · doi:10.1109/qomex.2019.8743252 · Cited by 523
Teo, P. C., & Heeger, D. J. (2002) · Proceedings of 1st International Conference on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/icip.1994.413502 · Cited by 471
Why do deep convolutional networks generalize so poorly to small image transformations?
Azulay, A., & Weiss, Y. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1805.12177 · Cited by 428 · cited 1×
“for texture resampling, we wanted the initial transformation to be translation-invariant. The “max pooling” operation of the original VGG architecture has been shown to disrupt translation-invariance [42], and leads to visible aliasing artifacts when used to interpolate between images with geodesic sequences [43]. To…”
MethodPieAPP: Perceptual Image-Error Assessment Through Pairwise Preference
Prashnani, E., Cai, H., Mostofi, Y., & Sen, P. (2018) · 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2018.00194 · Cited by 339
Wang, Z., & Simoncelli, E. P. (2008) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/8.12.8 · Cited by 138
Self-citation
Cited by
No-Reference Image Quality Assessment via Transformers, Relative Ranking, and Self-Consistency
Golestaneh, S. A., Dadsetan, S., & Kitani, K. M. (2022) · 2022 IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV) · doi:10.1109/wacv51458.2022.00404 · Cited by 465
Ego-Exo4D: Understanding Skilled Human Activity from First- and Third-Person Perspectives
Grauman, K., Westbury, A., Torresani, L., Kitani, K., Malik, J., Afouras, T., Ashutosh, K., Baiyya, V., Bansal, S., Boote, B., et al. (2024) · 2024 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr52733.2024.01834 · Cited by 182
DreamSim: Learning New Dimensions of Human Visual Similarity using Synthetic Data
Fu, S., Tamir, N., Sundaram, S., Chai, L., Zhang, R., Dekel, T., & Isola, P. (2023) · Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 36 · doi:10.52202/075280-2208 · Cited by 108
Deep neural network for blind visual quality assessment of 4K content
Lu, W., Sun, W., Min, X., Zhu, W., Zhou, Q., He, J., Wang, Q., Zhang, Z., Wang, T., & Zhai, G. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting · doi:10.1109/tbc.2022.3221689 · Cited by 60
Shift-Tolerant Perceptual Similarity Metric
Ghildyal, A., & Liu, F. (2022) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-19797-0_6 · Cited by 47
Metadata
- Authors
- Ding, K., Ma, K., Wang, S., & Simoncelli, E. P.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
- Published
- 2020
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1-1
- ISSN
- 0162-8828 (ISSN-L)
- 2160-9292
- 1939-3539
- OpenAlex
- W3017136408
- Cited by
- 952
- References
- 20
- FWCI
- 32.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
