Integrating Multi-Label Contrastive Learning With Dual Adversarial Graph Neural Networks for Cross-Modal Retrieval
Abstract
With the growing amount of multimodal data, cross-modal retrieval has attracted more and more attention and become a hot research topic. To date, most of the existing techniques mainly convert multimodal data into a common representation space where similarities in semantics between samples can be easily measured across multiple modalities. However, these approaches may suffer from the following limitations: 1) They overcome the modality gap by introducing loss in the common representation space, which may not be sufficient to eliminate the heterogeneity of various modalities; 2) They treat labels as independent entities and ignore label relationships, which is not conducive to establishing semantic connections across multimodal data; 3) They ignore the non-binary values of label similarity in multi-label scenarios, which may lead to inefficient alignment of representation similarity with label similarity. To tackle these problems, in this article, we propose two models to learn discriminative and modality-invariant representations for cross-modal retrieval. First, the dual generative adversarial networks are built to project multimodal data into a common representation space. Second, to model label relation dependencies and develop inter-dependent classifiers, we employ multi-hop graph neural networks (consisting of Probabilistic GNN and Iterative GNN), where the layer aggregation mechanism is suggested for using propagation information of various hops. Third, we propose a n…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A contrastive loss brings related modality pairs closer and distances unrelated pairs in a shared embedding space.
“The model is trained using a contrastive loss function to bring related modality pairs, like images and descriptions, closer in a shared embedding space while distancing unrelated pairs [179,180].”
From Multimodal fusion and vision–language models: A survey for robot vision (2026) · cites this paper as [180]
Cites
Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Coding
Oord, A. V. D., Li, Y., & Vinyals, O. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1807.03748 · Cited by 6,242 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Among the existing MI estimators, the InfoNCE [57] lower bound provides a low-variance estimation of MI for high dimensional data, albeit being biased [58].”
MethodSpatial Temporal Graph Convolutional Networks for Skeleton-Based Action Recognition
Yan, S., Xiong, Y., & Lin, D. (2018) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v32i1.12328 · Cited by 5,410 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In [39], [40], GCN is applied for capturing the correlation of human body skeletons to recognize human actions.”
Method
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Multimodal fusion and vision–language models: A survey for robot vision
Han, X., Chen, S., Fu, Z., Feng, Z., Fan, L., An, D., Wang, C., Guo, L., Meng, W., Zhang, X., et al. (2026) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2025.103652 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
“…model employs specialized encoders (e.g., convolutional neural networks for visual data, transformer architectures for text and audio data) [178, 179] to extract features from different modalities, and then interacts and integrates these features through cross-modal alignment mechanisms [180, 181].”
- Authors
- Qian, S., Xue, D., Fang, Q., & Xu, C.
- Affiliations
- Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
- Published
- 2022
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1-18
- ISSN
- 0162-8828 (ISSN-L)
- 2160-9292
- 1939-3539
- OpenAlex
- W4283837671
- Cited by
- 68
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 4.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques
- Keywords
- cross-modal retrieval, generative adversarial networks, modal reconstruction, modality gap, multimodal representation learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review