Cited by 68Multimodal Machine Learning ApplicationsAdvanced Image and Video Retrieval TechniquesImage Retrieval and Classification Techniques

Integrating Multi-Label Contrastive Learning With Dual Adversarial Graph Neural Networks for Cross-Modal Retrieval

Qian, Shengsheng, Xue, Dizhan, Fang, Quan, Xu, Changsheng·2022·IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence

Abstract

With the growing amount of multimodal data, cross-modal retrieval has attracted more and more attention and become a hot research topic. To date, most of the existing techniques mainly convert multimodal data into a common representation space where similarities in semantics between samples can be easily measured across multiple modalities. However, these approaches may suffer from the following limitations: 1) They overcome the modality gap by introducing loss in the common representation space, which may not be sufficient to eliminate the heterogeneity of various modalities; 2) They treat labels as independent entities and ignore label relationships, which is not conducive to establishing semantic connections across multimodal data; 3) They ignore the non-binary values of label similarity in multi-label scenarios, which may lead to inefficient alignment of representation similarity with label similarity. To tackle these problems, in this article, we propose two models to learn discriminative and modality-invariant representations for cross-modal retrieval. First, the dual generative adversarial networks are built to project multimodal data into a common representation space. Second, to model label relation dependencies and develop inter-dependent classifiers, we employ multi-hop graph neural networks (consisting of Probabilistic GNN and Iterative GNN), where the layer aggregation mechanism is suggested for using propagation information of various hops. Third, we propose a n…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tpami.2022.3188547

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A contrastive loss brings related modality pairs closer and distances unrelated pairs in a shared embedding space.

    “The model is trained using a contrastive loss function to bring related modality pairs, like images and descriptions, closer in a shared embedding space while distancing unrelated pairs [179,180].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Qian, S., Xue, D., Fang, Q., & Xu, C.
Affiliations
Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
Published
2022
Volume
45
Issue
4
Pages
1-18
ISSN
  • 0162-8828 (ISSN-L)
  • 2160-9292
  • 1939-3539
OpenAlex
W4283837671
Cited by
68
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 1
FWCI
4.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques
Keywords
cross-modal retrieval, generative adversarial networks, modal reconstruction, modality gap, multimodal representation learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review