The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Harmonic Power Flow Studies Part I - Formulation and Solution
Abstract
The conventional Newton-Raphson power flow study has been reformulated to permit the inclusion of non-linear loads. These loads give rise to harmonic signals which propagate throughout the power system. The reformulation is based on the reduction-to zero of the mismatch active power and reactive voltamperes, the imbalahce current at harmonic frequencies, and the mismatch apparent voltamperbs. Conclusions on the existance of positive, negative, and zero sequence signals is made for harmonic frequencies. The harmonic power flow study formulation is illustrated for a three phase full wave bridge rectifier.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Passive Filters—Potentialities and Limitations
Das, J. C. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications · doi:10.1109/tia.2003.821666 · Cited by 632
The Impact of Electric Vehicle Deployment on Load Management Straregies
Heydt, G. (1983) · IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems · doi:10.1109/tpas.1983.318071 · Cited by 147
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Xia, D., & Heydt, G.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems
- Published
- 1982-06
- Volume
- PAS-101
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1257-1265
- ISSN
- 0018-9510 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2155903355
- Cited by
- 278
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Harmonic Power Flow Studies Part I - Formulation and Solution. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tpas.1982.317171
- The paper
- Xia, D., & Heydt, G. (1982). Harmonic Power Flow Studies Part I - Formulation and Solution. IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems. https://doi.org/10.1109/tpas.1982.317171
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
