The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A System for Denial-of-Service Attack Detection Based on Multivariate Correlation Analysis
Abstract
Interconnected systems, such as Web servers, database servers, cloud computing servers and so on, are now under threads from network attackers. As one of most common and aggressive means, denial-of-service (DoS) attacks cause serious impact on these computing systems. In this paper, we present a DoS attack detection system that uses multivariate correlation analysis (MCA) for accurate network traffic characterization by extracting the geometrical correlations between network traffic features. Our MCA-based DoS attack detection system employs the principle of anomaly based detection in attack recognition. This makes our solution capable of detecting known and unknown DoS attacks effectively by learning the patterns of legitimate network traffic only. Furthermore, a triangle-area-based technique is proposed to enhance and to speed up the process of MCA. The effectiveness of our proposed detection system is evaluated using KDD Cup 99 data set, and the influences of both non-normalized data and normalized data on the performance of the proposed detection system are examined. The results show that our system outperforms two other previously developed state-of-the-art approaches in terms of detection accuracy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bro: a system for detecting network intruders in real-time
Paxson, V. (1999) · Computer Networks · doi:10.1016/s1389-1286(99)00112-7 · Cited by 2,636
Cited by
Survey of intrusion detection systems: Techniques, datasets and challenges
Khraisat, A., Gondal, I., Vamplew, P., & Kamruzzaman, J. (2019) · Cybersecurity · doi:10.1186/s42400-019-0038-7 · Cited by 2,024
IoT Security Techniques Based on Machine Learning: How Do IoT Devices Use AI to Enhance Security?
Xiao, L., Wan, X., Lu, X., Zhang, Y., & Wu, D. (2018) · IEEE Signal Processing Magazine · doi:10.1109/msp.2018.2825478 · Cited by 681
Garg, S., Kaur, K., Kumar, N., & Rodrigues, J. J. P. C. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Multimedia · doi:10.1109/tmm.2019.2893549 · Cited by 268
Machine Learning in IoT Security: Current Solutions and Future Challenges
Hussain, F., Hussain, R., Hassan, S. A., & Hossain, E. (2020) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2020.2986444 · Cited by 129
Stacked one-class broad learning system for intrusion detection in industry 4.0
Yang, K., Shi, Y., Yu, Z., Yang, Q., Sangaiah, A. K., & Zeng, H. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics · doi:10.1109/tii.2022.3157727 · Cited by 75
Metadata
- Authors
- Tan, Z., Jamdagni, A., He, X., Nanda, P., & Liu, R. P.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems
- Published
- 2014-02
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 447-456
- ISSN
- 1045-9219 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1998496248
- Cited by
- 314
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 25.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A System for Denial-of-Service Attack Detection Based on Multivariate Correlation Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tpds.2013.146
- The paper
- Tan, Z., Jamdagni, A., He, X., Nanda, P., & Liu, R. P. (2014). A System for Denial-of-Service Attack Detection Based on Multivariate Correlation Analysis. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems. https://doi.org/10.1109/tpds.2013.146
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.