The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Hybrid Deep-Learning-Based Anomaly Detection Scheme for Suspicious Flow Detection in SDN: A Social Multimedia Perspective
Abstract
The continuous development and usage of multi-media-based applications and services have contributed to the exponential growth of social multimedia traffic. In this context, secure transmission of data plays a critical role in realizing all of the key requirements of social multimedia networks such as reliability, scalability, quality of information, and quality of service (QoS). Thus, a trust-based paradigm for multimedia analytics is highly desired to meet the increasing user requirements and deliver more timely and actionable insights. In this regard, software-defined networks (SDNs) play a vital role; however, several factors such as as-runtime security, and energy-aware networking limit its capabilities to facilitate efficient network control and management. Thus, with the view to enhance the reliability of the SDN, a hybrid deep-learning-based anomaly detection scheme for suspicious flow detection in the context of social multimedia is proposed. It consists of the following two modules: (1) an anomaly detection module that leverages improved restricted Boltzmann machine and gradient descent-based support vector machine to detect the abnormal activities, and (2) an end-to-end data delivery module to satisfy strict QoS requirements of the SDN, that is, high bandwidth and low latency. Finally, the proposed scheme has been experimentally evaluated on both real-time and benchmark datasets to prove its effectiveness and efficiency in terms of anomaly detection and data delivery essential for social multimedia. Further, a large-scale analysis over a Carnegie Mellon University (CMU)-based insider threat dataset has been conducted to identify its performance in terms of detecting malicious events such as-Identity theft, profile cloning, confidential data collection, etc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
1 retracted
Sun, X. N., Zhang, C., Ding, S., & Quan, C. (2018) · Multimedia Tools and Applications · doi:10.1007/s11042-018-5665-6 · Cited by 23
Retracted(2014) · Cited by 33,419
A Practical Guide to Training Restricted Boltzmann Machines
Hinton, G. E. (2012) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-35289-8_32 · Cited by 2,852
A Deep Learning Approach to Network Intrusion Detection
Shone, N., Ngoc, T. N., Phai, V. D., & Shi, Q. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computational Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tetci.2017.2772792 · Cited by 1,819
Kivinen, J., Smola, A. J., & Williamson, R. C. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/tsp.2004.830991 · Cited by 1,004
Detecting anomalous events in videos by learning deep representations of appearance and motion
Xu, D., Yan, Y., Ricci, E., & Sebe, N. (2017) · Computer Vision and Image Understanding · doi:10.1016/j.cviu.2016.10.010 · Cited by 474
Al-Yaseen, W. L., Othman, Z. A., & Nazri, M. Z. A. (2016) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2016.09.041 · Cited by 470
Deep-anomaly: Fully convolutional neural network for fast anomaly detection in crowded scenes
Sabokrou, M., Fayyaz, M., Fathy, M., Moayed, Z., & Klette, R. (2018) · Computer Vision and Image Understanding · doi:10.1016/j.cviu.2018.02.006 · Cited by 470
Kaur, K., Garg, S., Aujla, G. S., Kumar, N., Rodrigues, J. J. P. C., & Guizani, M. (2018) · IEEE Communications Magazine · doi:10.1109/mcom.2018.1700622 · Cited by 353
Self-citationDeep learning for natural language processing: advantages and challenges
Li, H. (2018) · National Science Review · doi:10.1093/nsr/nwx110 · Cited by 332
Cited by
Machine Learning for Anomaly Detection: A Systematic Review
Nassif, A. B., Talib, M. A., Nasir, Q., & Dakalbab, F. M. (2021) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3083060 · Cited by 748
Smart Anomaly Detection in Sensor Systems: A Multi-Perspective Review
Erhan, L., Ndubuaku, M., Di Mauro, M., Song, W., Chen, M., Fortino, G., Bagdasar, O., & Liotta, A. (2021) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2020.10.001 · Cited by 378
Using the internet of things in smart energy systems and networks
Ahmad, T., & Zhang, D. (2021) · Sustainable Cities and Society · doi:10.1016/j.scs.2021.102783 · Cited by 332
IoT anomaly detection methods and applications: A survey
Chatterjee, A., & Ahmed, B. S. (2022) · Internet of Things · doi:10.1016/j.iot.2022.100568 · Cited by 323
Preserving Privacy in the Internet of Connected Vehicles
Ghane, S., Jolfaei, A., Kulik, L., Ramamohanarao, K., & Puthal, D. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems · doi:10.1109/tits.2020.2964410 · Cited by 105
Metadata
- Authors
- Garg, S., Kaur, K., Kumar, N., & Rodrigues, J. J. P. C.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Multimedia
- Published
- 2019-03
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 566-578
- ISSN
- 1520-9210 (ISSN-L)
- 1941-0077
- OpenAlex
- W2908941882
- Cited by
- 268
- References
- 36
- FWCI
- 23.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hybrid Deep-Learning-Based Anomaly Detection Scheme for Suspicious Flow Detection in SDN: A Social Multimedia Perspective. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tmm.2019.2893549
- The paper
- Garg, S., Kaur, K., Kumar, N., & Rodrigues, J. J. P. C. (2019). Hybrid Deep-Learning-Based Anomaly Detection Scheme for Suspicious Flow Detection in SDN: A Social Multimedia Perspective. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia. https://doi.org/10.1109/tmm.2019.2893549
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.