The DOI matches its Crossref record.
On False Data-Injection Attacks against Power System State Estimation: Modeling and Countermeasures
Abstract
It is critical for a power system to estimate its operation state based on meter measurements in the field and the configuration of power grid networks. Recent studies show that the adversary can bypass the existing bad data detection schemes, posing dangerous threats to the operation of power grid systems. Nevertheless, two critical issues remain open: 1) how can an adversary choose the meters to compromise to cause the most significant deviation of the system state estimation, and 2) how can a system operator defend against such attacks? To address these issues, we first study the problem of finding the optimal attack strategy--i.e., a data-injection attacking strategy that selects a set of meters to manipulate so as to cause the maximum damage. We formalize the problem and develop efficient algorithms to identify the optimal meter set. We implement and test our attack strategy on various IEEE standard bus systems, and demonstrate its superiority over a baseline strategy of random selections. To defend against false data-injection attacks, we propose a protection-based defense and a detection-based defense, respectively. For the protection-based defense, we identify and protect critical sensors and make the system more resilient to attacks. For the detection-based defense, we develop the spatial-based and temporal-based detection schemes to accurately identify data-injection attacks.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Lin, J., Yu, W., Zhang, N., Yang, X., Zhang, H., & Zhao, W. (2017) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2017.2683200 · Cited by 2,793
Self-citationA Survey on the Edge Computing for the Internet of Things
Yu, W., Liang, F., He, X., Hatcher, W. G., Lu, C., Lin, J., & Yang, X. (2018) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2017.2778504 · Cited by 1,520
Self-citationCyber-Physical Systems Security—A Survey
Humayed, A., Lin, J., Li, F., & Luo, B. (2017) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2017.2703172 · Cited by 1,185
He, Y., Mendis, G. J., & Wei, J. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid · doi:10.1109/tsg.2017.2703842 · Cited by 834
A Survey on Industrial Internet of Things: A Cyber-Physical Systems Perspective
Xu, H., Yu, W., Griffith, D., & Golmie, N. (2018) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2018.2884906 · Cited by 637
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Yang, Q., Yang, J., Yu, W., An, D., Zhang, N., & Zhao, W.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems
- Published
- 2014-03
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 717-729
- ISSN
- 1045-9219 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2098897917
- Cited by
- 404
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 22.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On False Data-Injection Attacks against Power System State Estimation: Modeling and Countermeasures. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tpds.2013.92
- The paper
- Yang, Q., Yang, J., Yu, W., An, D., Zhang, N., & Zhao, W. (2014). On False Data-Injection Attacks against Power System State Estimation: Modeling and Countermeasures. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems. https://doi.org/10.1109/tpds.2013.92
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.