The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Bridgeless PFC Boost Rectifier With Optimized Magnetic Utilization
Abstract
The implementation of a bridgeless power factor correction (PFC) boost rectifier with low common-mode noise is presented in this paper. The proposed implementation employs a unique multiple-winding, multicore inductor to increase the utilization of the magnetic material. The operation and performance of the circuit were verified on a 750-W, universal-line experimental prototype operating at 110 kHz.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Bridgeless SEPIC PFC Rectifier With Reduced Components and Conduction Losses
Mahdavi, M., & Farzanehfard, H. (2011) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics · doi:10.1109/tie.2010.2095393 · Cited by 285
Analysis and Design of a New AC–DC Single-Stage Full-Bridge PWM Converter With Two Controllers
Das, P., Pahlevaninezhad, M., & Moschopoulos, G. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics · doi:10.1109/tie.2012.2227915 · Cited by 74
Metadata
- Authors
- Jang, Y., & Jovanovic, M. M.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics
- Published
- 2009-01
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 85-93
- ISSN
- 0885-8993 (ISSN-L)
- 1941-0107
- OpenAlex
- W2144117691
- Cited by
- 263
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Bridgeless PFC Boost Rectifier With Optimized Magnetic Utilization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tpel.2008.2006054
- The paper
- Jang, Y., & Jovanovic, M. M. (2009). A Bridgeless PFC Boost Rectifier With Optimized Magnetic Utilization. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics. https://doi.org/10.1109/tpel.2008.2006054
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
