The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Classification and Comparative Evaluation of PV Panel-Integrated DC–DC Converter Concepts
Abstract
The strings of photovoltaic panels have a significantly reduced power output when mismatch between the panels occurs, as, e.g., caused by partial shading. With mismatch, either the panel-integrated diodes are bypassing the shaded panels if the string is operated at the current level of the unshaded panels, or some power of the unshaded panels is lost if the string current is reduced to the level of the shaded panels. With the implementation of dc-dc converters on panel level, the maximum available power can be extracted from each panel regardless of any mismatch. In this paper, different concepts of PV panel-integrated dc-dc converters are presented and their suitability for panel integration is evaluated. The buck-boost converter is identified as the most promising concept and an efficiency/power density ( η- ρ) Pareto optimization of this topology is shown. Based on the optimization results, two 275 W converter prototypes with either Silicon MOSFETs with a switching frequency of 100 kHz or gallium nitride FETs with a switching frequency of 400 kHz are designed for an input voltage range of 15 to 45 V and an output voltage range of 10 to 100 V. The theoretical considerations are verified by efficiency measurements which are compared to the characteristics of a commercial panel-integrated converter.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Venkatachalam, K., Sullivan, C. R., Abdallah, T., & Tacca, H. (2003) · 2002 IEEE Workshop on Computers in Power Electronics, 2002. Proceedings. · doi:10.1109/cipe.2002.1196712 · Cited by 1,145
Cited by
Xue, L., Shen, Z., Boroyevich, D., Mattavelli, P., & Diaz, D. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics · doi:10.1109/tpel.2015.2413815 · Cited by 420
A Comprehensive Review on CubeSat Electrical Power System Architectures
Edpuganti, A., Khadkikar, V., Moursi, M. S. E., Zeineldin, H., Al-Sayari, N., & Al Hosani, K. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics · doi:10.1109/tpel.2021.3110002 · Cited by 70
Metadata
- Authors
- Kasper, M., Bortis, D., & Kolar, J. W.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics
- Published
- 2014-05
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 2511-2526
- ISSN
- 0885-8993 (ISSN-L)
- 1941-0107
- OpenAlex
- W2102422698
- Cited by
- 332
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 14.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Classification and Comparative Evaluation of PV Panel-Integrated DC–DC Converter Concepts. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tpel.2013.2273399
- The paper
- Kasper, M., Bortis, D., & Kolar, J. W. (2014). Classification and Comparative Evaluation of PV Panel-Integrated DC–DC Converter Concepts. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics. https://doi.org/10.1109/tpel.2013.2273399
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.