Control of arm capacitor voltages in modular multilevel converters
Open accessAbstract
Modular multilevel converters have several attractive features such as a modular structure, high voltage capability and scalability, excellent quality of the output voltage waveforms, as well as, low expense for redundancy. However, the main drawback of this converter is the complexity of the control system due to the multiple control objectives which include the input, output, circulating current and the capacitor voltages. Several control schemes for the capacitor voltages have been proposed, being usually divided into the control of the average voltage and the balancing of the capacitor voltages among the submodules and among the arms. These control schemes can effectively control the capacitor voltage when the reference is the same for all arms, but they cannot manage arbitrary voltage references when each arm capacitor voltage must be controlled independently as required, for example, to achieve maximum power point tracking in photovoltaic applications. This paper proposes a control strategy for a modular multilevel converter capable to manage the average capacitor voltage of each arm independently. The proposed scheme is based on a decomposition of the energy of the arms in different components, according to theirs symmetries. Results validating the performance of the proposed control scheme are shown and the impact on the output current is also discussed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A control structure using three stages: an internal capacitor voltage balance, a current control stage, and a voltage or energy control stage has commonly been employed.
“Since then, a control structure using three stages: an internal capacitor voltage balance, a current control stage, and a voltage, or energy, control stage, as shown in Fig. 4, has commonly been employed [57], [58].”
From Modular Multilevel Converters: Recent Achievements and Challenges (2021) · cites this paper as [58]
The energy approach for the outermost control loop has the advantage of providing a linear relationship between power and currents, keeping the same dynamic behavior even if the operating point changes.
“Both alternatives have shown to provide proper regulation, but the energy approach has the advantage of providing a linear relationship between power and currents, keeping the same dynamic behavior even if the operating point changes.”
From Modular Multilevel Converters: Recent Achievements and Challenges (2021) · cites this paper as [63]
Cites
Circuit Topologies, Modeling, Control Schemes, and Applications of Modular Multilevel Converters
Perez, M. A., Bernet, S., Rodriguez, J., Kouro, S., & Lizana, R. (2015) · IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics · doi:10.1109/tpel.2014.2310127 · Cited by 1,346 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Dekka, A., Wu, B., Fuentes, R. L., Perez, M., & Zargari, N. R. (2017) · IEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Power Electronics · doi:10.1109/jestpe.2017.2742938 · Cited by 576 · see citing works
Self-citationLeon, J. I., Vazquez, S., & Franquelo, L. G. (2017) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2017.2726583 · Cited by 481 · see citing works
Modular Multilevel Converters: Recent Achievements and Challenges
Perez, M. A., Ceballos, S., Konstantinou, G., Pou, J., & Aguilera, R. P. (2021) · IEEE Open Journal of the Industrial Electronics Society · doi:10.1109/ojies.2021.3060791 · Cited by 327 · see citing works
“The outermost control loop is usually focused on regulating the average arm capacitor voltages [63], or energies [64].”
BackgroundSelf-citation
- Authors
- Lizana, R., Perez, M. A., Bernet, S., Espinoza, J. R., & Rodriguez, J.
- Affiliations
- Technische Universität Dresden (DE)
- ORCID
- Bernet, Steffen
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics
- Published
- 2016-02
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 1774-1784
- ISSN
- 0885-8993 (ISSN-L)
- 1941-0107
- OpenAlex
- W2054827890
- Cited by
- 70
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 2
- FWCI
- 5.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- americanae.aecid.es
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics (publishedVersion)
- Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria
- Technische Universitat Dresden
- Fondecyt Program (1121090)
- Advanced Center for Electrical and Electronic Engineering (FB0008)
- Solar Energy Research Center (CONICYT/FONDAP/15110019)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › HVDC Systems and Fault Protection
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Multilevel Inverters and Converters
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced DC-DC Converters
- Keywords
- modular multilevel converter, circulating current control, maximum power point tracking, photovoltaic applications, energy decomposition analysis, output current ripple
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review