The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
DC Microgrids–Part I: A Review of Control Strategies and Stabilization Techniques
Open accessAbstract
This paper presents a review of control strategies, stability analysis, and stabilization techniques for dc microgrids (MGs). Overall control is systematically classified into local and coordinated control levels according to respective functionalities in each level. As opposed to local control, which relies only on local measurements, some line of communication between units needs to be made available in order to achieve the coordinated control. Depending on the communication method, three basic coordinated control strategies can be distinguished, i.e., decentralized, centralized, and distributed control. Decentralized control can be regarded as an extension of the local control since it is also based exclusively on local measurements. In contrast, centralized and distributed control strategies rely on digital communication technologies. A number of approaches using these three coordinated control strategies to achieve various control objectives are reviewed in this paper. Moreover, properties of dc MG dynamics and stability are discussed. This paper illustrates that tightly regulated point-of-load converters tend to reduce the stability margins of the system since they introduce negative impedances, which can potentially oscillate with lightly damped power supply input filters. It is also demonstrated that how the stability of the whole system is defined by the relationship of the source and load impedances, referred to as the minor loop gain. Several prominent specifications for the minor loop gain are reviewed. Finally, a number of active stabilization techniques are presented.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Consensus Problems in Networks of Agents With Switching Topology and Time-Delays
Olfati-Saber, R., & Murray, R. M. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2004.834113 · Cited by 12,788 · cited 2×
“2For the exact definition and a more in-depth discussion of the connectivity of communication networks, see [76].”
BackgroundConsensus and Cooperation in Networked Multi-Agent Systems
Olfati-Saber, R., Fax, J. A., & Murray, R. M. (2007) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2006.887293 · Cited by 10,522
Guerrero, J. M., Vasquez, J. C., Matas, J., de Vicuna, L. G., & Castilla, M. (2011) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics · doi:10.1109/tie.2010.2066534 · Cited by 5,075
Self-citation
Cited by
Review on Control of DC Microgrids
Meng, L., Shafiee, Q., Ferrari Trecate, G., Karimi, H., Fulwani, D., Lu, X., & Guerrero, J. M. (2017) · IEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Power Electronics · doi:10.1109/jestpe.2017.2690219 · Cited by 513
Self-citationMicrogrid clustering architectures
Bullich-Massagué, E., Díaz-González, F., Aragüés-Peñalba, M., Girbau-Llistuella, F., Olivella-Rosell, P., & Sumper, A. (2018) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.12.048 · Cited by 245
Microgrid control: A comprehensive survey
Sen, S., & Kumar, V. (2018) · Annual Reviews in Control · doi:10.1016/j.arcontrol.2018.04.012 · Cited by 228
Metadata
- Authors
- Dragicevic, T., Lu, X., Vasquez, J., & Guerrero, J.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics
- Published
- 2015
- Pages
- 1-1
- ISSN
- 0885-8993 (ISSN-L)
- 1941-0107
- OpenAlex
- W2232335510
- Cited by
- 1,564
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 92.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: DC Microgrids–Part I: A Review of Control Strategies and Stabilization Techniques. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tpel.2015.2478859
- The paper
- Dragicevic, T., Lu, X., Vasquez, J., & Guerrero, J. (2015). DC Microgrids–Part I: A Review of Control Strategies and Stabilization Techniques. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics. https://doi.org/10.1109/tpel.2015.2478859
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.