Soft-Switching Solid-State Transformer With Reduced Conduction Loss
Abstract
Solid-state transformers (SSTs) are a promising solution photovoltaic (PV), wind, traction, data center, battery energy storage system (BESS), and fast charging electric vehicle (EV) applications. The traditional SSTs are typically three-stage, i.e., hard-switching cascaded multilevel rectifiers and inverters with dual active bridge (DAB) converters, which leads to bulky passives, low efficiency, and high electromagnetic interference (EMI). This article proposes a new soft-switching solid-state transformer (S4T). The S4T has full-range zero-voltage switching (ZVS), electrolytic capacitor-less dc link, and controlled dv/dt, which reduces EMI. The S4T comprises two reverse-blocking current-source inverter (CSI) bridges, auxiliary branches for ZVS, and transformer magnetizing inductor as a reduced dc link with 60% ripple. Compared with the prior S4T, an effective change on the leakage inductance diode is made to reduce the number of the devices on the main power path by 20% for significant conduction loss saving and retain the same functionality of damping the resonance between the leakage and resonant capacitors and recycling trapped leakage energy. The conduction loss saving is crucial, being the dominating loss mechanism in SSTs. Importantly, the proposed single-stage SST not only holds the potential for high power density and high efficiency but also has full functionality, e.g., multiport dc loads integration, voltage regulation, and reactive power compensation, unlike the…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The S4T achieves a short resonant time and small lost duty cycle.
“In contrast, the S4T achieves a short resonant time and small lost duty cycle [1].”
From 7.2 kV Three-Port SiC Single-Stage Current-Source Solid-State Transformer With 90 kV Lightning Protection (2022) · cites this paper as [1]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 38 · Cited by 105
- Authors
- Zheng, L., Kandula, R. P., & Divan, D.
- Affiliations
- Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics
- Published
- 2021-05
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 5236-5249
- ISSN
- 0885-8993 (ISSN-L)
- 1941-0107
- OpenAlex
- W3094233933
- Cited by
- 105
- References
- 38
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 2
- FWCI
- 5.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics (publishedVersion)
- OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
- SMARTech Repository (Georgia Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Advanced Research Projects Agency - Energy
- U.S. Department of Energy (DE-AR0000899)
- Center for Distributed Energy, Georgia Tech
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced DC-DC Converters
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Multilevel Inverters and Converters
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Wireless Power Transfer Systems
- Keywords
- solid-state transformer, soft switching, zero-voltage switching, conduction loss reduction, current source inverter, leakage inductance, electromagnetic interference, bidirectional DC-DC conversion, AC-AC conversion, DC-AC conversion, voltage regulation, reactive power compensation, SiC MOSFET, medium-voltage distribution networks
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review