The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Age-Dependent Fragility Models of Utility Wood Poles in Power Distribution Networks Against Extreme Wind Hazards
Abstract
Wood poles comprise a portion of the power utility's aging infrastructure that make a significant impact on customer's reliability. A large number may fail under the influence of severe wind storms and hurricanes, sometimes resulting in millions of dollars in replacement costs per year to the utilities. A holistic approach to risk assessment of wood poles in power distribution networks would therefore consider the simultaneous effects of decay and natural hazards on the failure probability of the poles. Toward this goal, this paper presents a framework for the development of age-dependent fragility curves of utility wood poles that relies on age-dependent probabilistic capacity models of wood poles and wind induced demand models. The framework considers uncertainties in the initial fiber strength of the wood poles, the age-dependent capacity loss model, the geometric features of wood poles of different classes, and the applied wind loads. The results of this study show that the decay process in wood poles may increase the fragility of the poles significantly as the age of the poles increase. The fragility curves provided in this research may constitute a major component of risk assessment approaches of power distribution networks against hurricanes and strong winds.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Panteli, M., & Mancarella, P. (2015) · Electric Power Systems Research · doi:10.1016/j.epsr.2015.06.012 · Cited by 932
Metrics and quantitative framework for assessing microgrid resilience against windstorms
Amirioun, M. H., Aminifar, F., Lesani, H., & Shahidehpour, M. (2019) · International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems · doi:10.1016/j.ijepes.2018.07.025 · Cited by 208
Power outage prediction for natural hazards using synthetic power distribution systems
Zhai, C., Chen, T. Y.-J., White, A. G., & Guikema, S. D. (2021) · Reliability Engineering & System Safety · doi:10.1016/j.ress.2020.107348 · Cited by 64
RISK-BASED ASSESSMENT AND STRENGTHENING OF ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEMS SUBJECTED TO NATURAL HAZARDS
Salman, A. (2020) · doi:10.37099/mtu.dc.etdr/207 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Shafieezadeh, A., Onyewuchi, U. P., Begovic, M. M., & DesRoches, R.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery
- Published
- 2014-02
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 131-139
- ISSN
- 0885-8977 (ISSN-L)
- 1937-4208
- OpenAlex
- W2034935555
- Cited by
- 159
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Age-Dependent Fragility Models of Utility Wood Poles in Power Distribution Networks Against Extreme Wind Hazards. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tpwrd.2013.2281265
- The paper
- Shafieezadeh, A., Onyewuchi, U. P., Begovic, M. M., & DesRoches, R. (2014). Age-Dependent Fragility Models of Utility Wood Poles in Power Distribution Networks Against Extreme Wind Hazards. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery. https://doi.org/10.1109/tpwrd.2013.2281265
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.