The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Comparisons Among Clustering Techniques for Electricity Customer Classification
Abstract
The recent evolution of the electricity business regulation has given new possibilities to the electricity providers for formulating dedicated tariff offers. A key aspect for building specific tariff structures is the identification of the consumption patterns of the customers, in order to form specific customer classes containing customers exhibiting similar patterns. This paper illustrates and compares the results obtained by using various unsupervised clustering algorithms (modified follow-the-leader, hierarchical clustering, K-means, fuzzy K-means) and the self-organizing maps to group together customers with similar electrical behavior. Furthermore, this paper discusses and compares various techniques-Sammon map, principal component analysis (PCA), and curvilinear component analysis (CCA)-able to reduce the size of the clustering input data set, in order to allow for storing a relatively small amount of data in the database of the distribution service provider for customer classification purposes. The effectiveness of the classifications obtained with the algorithms tested is compared in terms of a set of clustering validity indicators. Results obtained on a set of nonresidential customers are presented.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
From demand response to integrated demand response: review and prospect of research and application
Huang, W., Zhang, N., Kang, C., Li, M., & Huo, M. (2019) · Protection and Control of Modern Power Systems · doi:10.1186/s41601-019-0126-4 · Cited by 312
Load profiling and its application to demand response: A review
Wang, Y., Chen, Q., Kang, C., Zhang, M., Wang, K., & Zhao, Y. (2015) · Tsinghua Science and Technology · doi:10.1109/tst.2015.7085625 · Cited by 268
Hasan, K. N., Rahman, M. T., Terrill, C., McLean, R., Rodricks, R., Sharma, A., & Islam, A. (2025) · Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments · doi:10.1016/j.seta.2024.104141 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Chicco, G., Napoli, R., & Piglione, F.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Power Systems
- Published
- 2006-05
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 933-940
- ISSN
- 0885-8950 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2117604780
- Cited by
- 513
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparisons Among Clustering Techniques for Electricity Customer Classification. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tpwrs.2006.873122
- The paper
- Chicco, G., Napoli, R., & Piglione, F. (2006). Comparisons Among Clustering Techniques for Electricity Customer Classification. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems. https://doi.org/10.1109/tpwrs.2006.873122
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.