The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evaluation of Achievable Vehicle-to-Grid Capacity Using Aggregate PEV Model
Abstract
Large-scale plug-in electric vehicles (PEVs) utilizing vehicle-to-grid (V2G) technology can collectively behave as a storage system under the control of an aggregator, e.g., arbitraging in the energy market and providing ancillary services to the grid. Quantitatively evaluating V2G capacity, i.e., charging and discharging power ranges, for a PEV fleet utilizing V2G technology (which is referred to as a V2G fleet in this paper) ahead of time is of fundamental importance for V2G implementation. However, because of the stochastic characteristics of PEV driving behaviors, charging demands are difficult to forecast, which makes evaluating V2G capacity technically difficult. This paper first establishes an aggregate model of a V2G fleet that employs aggregated parameters to represent energy and power constraints of the entire V2G fleet and, therefore, reduces the difficulty of forecasting. Then, an evaluation method for V2G capacity of large-scale PEVs is developed based on the proposed aggregate model. To make the V2G capacity evaluated in advance achievable while guaranteeing charging demands during real-time operation, a heuristic smart charging strategy is designed. The application of the evaluation method in optimal charge and discharge scheduling for a V2G fleet providing power reserves is illustrated. Numerical simulations are conducted to validate the proposed method.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kempton, W., & Tomić, J. (2005) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2004.12.022 · Cited by 2,126
Photovoltaic and solar power forecasting for smart grid energy management
Wan, C., Zhao, J., Song, Y., Xu, Z., Lin, J., & Hu, Z. (2015) · CSEE Journal of Power and Energy Systems · doi:10.17775/cseejpes.2015.00046 · Cited by 654
Self-citation
Cited by
Energy management system for smart grid: An overview and key issues
Rathor, S. K., & Saxena, D. (2020) · International Journal of Energy Research · doi:10.1002/er.4883 · Cited by 494
Hui, H., Ding, Y., Shi, Q., Li, F., Song, Y., & Yan, J. (2020) · Applied Energy · doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113972 · Cited by 373
Self-citationTime-of-Use tariff rates estimation for optimal demand-side management using electric vehicles
Kaur, A. P., & Singh, M. (2023) · Energy · doi:10.1016/j.energy.2023.127243 · Cited by 67
Jian, J., Zhang, M., Xu, Y., Tang, W., & He, S. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy · doi:10.1109/tste.2023.3275566 · Cited by 56
Real-time feedback based online aggregate EV power flexibility characterization
Yan, D., Huang, S., & Chen, Y. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy · doi:10.1109/tste.2023.3324705 · Cited by 51
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, H., Hu, Z., Xu, Z., & Song, Y.
- Venue
- IEEE Transactions on Power Systems
- Published
- 2017-01
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 784-794
- ISSN
- 0885-8950 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-0679
- OpenAlex
- W2346213479
- Cited by
- 329
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 13.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluation of Achievable Vehicle-to-Grid Capacity Using Aggregate PEV Model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/tpwrs.2016.2561296
- The paper
- Zhang, H., Hu, Z., Xu, Z., & Song, Y. (2017). Evaluation of Achievable Vehicle-to-Grid Capacity Using Aggregate PEV Model. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems. https://doi.org/10.1109/tpwrs.2016.2561296
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.