Cited by 654Solar Radiation and PhotovoltaicsEnergy Load and Power ForecastingPhotovoltaic System Optimization Techniques

Photovoltaic and solar power forecasting for smart grid energy management

Open access
Wan, Can, Zhao, Jian, Song, Yonghua, Xu, Zhao, Lin, Jin, Hu, Zechun·2015·CSEE Journal of Power and Energy Systems

Abstract

Due to the challenge of climate and energy crisis, renewable energy generation including solar generation has experienced significant growth. Increasingly high penetration level of photovoltaic (PV) generation arises in smart grid. Solar power is intermittent and variable, as the solar source at the ground level is highly dependent on cloud cover variability, atmospheric aerosol levels, and other atmosphere parameters. The inherent variability of large-scale solar generation introduces significant challenges to smart grid energy management. Accurate forecasting of solar power/irradiance is critical to secure economic operation of the smart grid. This paper provides a comprehensive review of the theoretical forecasting methodologies for both solar resource and PV power. Applications of solar forecasting in energy management of smart grid are also investigated in detail.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.17775/cseejpes.2015.00046

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Since weather fundamentally drives both variable generation and electricity demand, ML algorithms forecasting these quantities should draw from innovations in climate modeling and weather forecasting and in hybrid physics-plus-ML modeling techniques.

    “since weather fundamentally drives both variable generation and electricity demand, ML algorithms forecasting these quantities should draw from innovations in climate modeling and weather forecasting (Section 8) and in hybrid physics-plus-ML modeling techniques [161,818,822].”

    From Tackling climate change with machine learning (2023) · cites this paper as [822]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wan, C., Zhao, J., Song, Y., Xu, Z., Lin, J., & Hu, Z.
Affiliations
  • Tsinghua University (CN)
  • Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK)
Venue
CSEE Journal of Power and Energy Systems
Published
2015-12
Volume
1
Issue
4
Pages
38-46
ISSN
2096-0042 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2524035252
Cited by
654
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 41 · 2025: 63 · 2024: 79 · 2023: 75 · 2022: 65 · 2021: 82 · 2020: 74 · 2019: 61 · 2018: 55 · 2017: 43 · 2016: 16
FWCI
37.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
CSEE Journal of Power and Energy Systems (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Solar Radiation and Photovoltaics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Energy Load and Power Forecasting
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Photovoltaic System Optimization Techniques
Keywords
photovoltaic power forecasting, solar irradiance forecasting, smart grid energy management, renewable energy integration, cloud cover variability, atmospheric aerosols, forecasting methods

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review